From nobody Sun Nov 24 13:59:37 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1724417751; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=PUnLufZf/KzQou/bG4haBUsYFzKcseE/hkenAXkRpTB6nxwnonmjwyD4pvVSFl+uW0Kxd9OdzQ92PjClDvuXtJuEDl5ypDlPlD31kUieugYpomAgMDfGUMxJXuFDiW+fMeqvxupsuYAO4MVgE8rzI1hE/oZvrR358f3VpheaYio= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1724417751; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id; bh=dZ8SDUosSEgaAhh3RkR7aaVS1/GJohf/rFlRTMpfdLk=; b=H6Lisjt34pi1gHiQUhC6hejZeoOjNSztpiLwOyxDfhd4UzcXa4OSi3PrDLtQADmTpmExg3bh5p61qEjzZA3LPZeLLiyVf6E41tBeA2kcWCfpkWMP5JYdJSRIDjYbGJU1ZWqE+cb2sk0x4yYAXBq7lhVjZkeka8Sj+i7MocnHKr8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1724417750176139.51657108367635; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 05:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shTpF-0007Bx-RF; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:55:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shTpD-0007AH-Ab; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:55:31 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shTpB-0005Aj-Ov; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:55:31 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Wr0Mf5PQlz6K918; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 20:52:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.161.198]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E73A140B2A; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 20:55:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from a2303103017.china.huawei.com (10.47.79.211) by lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:55:22 +0100 To: , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH 1/2] target/arm/tcg: increase cache level for cpu=max Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:54:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20240823125446.721-2-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240823125446.721-1-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> References: <20240823125446.721-1-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.47.79.211] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Alireza Sanaee From: Alireza Sanaee via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1724417752896116600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This patch addresses cache description in the `aarch64_max_tcg_initfn` function. It introduces three layers of caches and modifies the cache description registers accordingly. Additionally, a new function is added to handle cache description when CCIDX is disabled. The CCIDX remains disabled for cpu=3Dmax configuration. TODO: I am planning to send a separate patch using this cache description function for the rest of the CPU types. This is a starting point to test L3 caches for cpu=3Dmax. Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee --- target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c index fe232eb306..f2b6fb6d84 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c +++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c @@ -55,6 +55,32 @@ static uint64_t make_ccsidr64(unsigned assoc, unsigned l= inesize, | (lg_linesize - 4); } =20 +static uint64_t make_ccsidr32(unsigned assoc, unsigned linesize, + unsigned cachesize) +{ + unsigned lg_linesize =3D ctz32(linesize); + unsigned sets; + + /* + * The 32-bit CCSIDR_EL1 format is: + * [27:13] number of sets - 1 + * [12:3] associativity - 1 + * [2:0] log2(linesize) - 4 + * so 0 =3D=3D 16 bytes, 1 =3D=3D 32 bytes, 2 =3D=3D 64 byte= s, etc + */ + assert(assoc !=3D 0); + assert(is_power_of_2(linesize)); + assert(lg_linesize >=3D 4 && lg_linesize <=3D 7 + 4); + + /* sets * associativity * linesize =3D=3D cachesize. */ + sets =3D cachesize / (assoc * linesize); + assert(cachesize % (assoc * linesize) =3D=3D 0); + + return ((uint64_t)(sets - 1) << 13) + | ((assoc - 1) << 3) + | (lg_linesize - 4); +} + static void aarch64_a35_initfn(Object *obj) { ARMCPU *cpu =3D ARM_CPU(obj); @@ -1086,6 +1112,15 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj) uint64_t t; uint32_t u; =20 + /* + * Expanded cache set + */ + cpu->clidr =3D 0x8200123; /* 4 4 3 in 3 bit fields */ + cpu->ccsidr[0] =3D make_ccsidr32(4, 64, 64 * KiB); /* 64KB L1 dcache */ + cpu->ccsidr[1] =3D cpu->ccsidr[0]; /* 64KB L1 icache */ + cpu->ccsidr[2] =3D make_ccsidr32(8, 64, 1 * MiB); /* 1MB L2 unified c= ache */ + cpu->ccsidr[4] =3D make_ccsidr32(8, 64, 2 * MiB); /* 2MB L3 unified c= ache */ + /* * Unset ARM_FEATURE_BACKCOMPAT_CNTFRQ, which we would otherwise defau= lt * to because we started with aarch64_a57_initfn(). A 'max' CPU might --=20 2.34.1