From nobody Mon Nov 25 06:19:56 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1717485583; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=VxFjv/7GL4t48Kymi63YAV4hcCkMeMa6GYYx1tyqqAvLht2ph6foaZ+LJpKHU+1YdNjSUy9ykutYmw1mBkkTD6yxFDj40mqOEsI64Smv+tUn1l1U66kjhv99407JHBCMMbzDIv92WVqsGpe9LOO6/XhRmc+WpmNvLpv8u57+VFw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1717485583; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=kSWUo4sCXjrNOR0yu+FmZCYBkQr0GiAN238dsmBJ6yo=; b=K+BnyEM8WQcCMIt8jGLhuE1VvXfNCVchqS8ekA2tBKGEJ7GI0Lu/AUqyhbIcloim1XZ9DJ2VfPhw7cLZTJLZ5Aeig60ORg4smW/ilUhbdtqevQt2ZIV2GlTuQ88DbPw3VbLqMpN6pvAc+UvTo8yvFfLg8FRbxQKSsuWRWtDHDqg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1717485583207684.658652637204; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 00:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEORU-00033j-Tx; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 03:18:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEORS-0002zc-WB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 03:18:47 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEORQ-0005ai-Ox for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 03:18:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-614-QlqoyUdePouWqsE8TZtvMQ-1; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 03:18:43 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a68f2d64342so15791466b.1 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avogadro.local ([151.81.115.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a68f4191cfdsm332559566b.137.2024.06.04.00.18.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717485524; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kSWUo4sCXjrNOR0yu+FmZCYBkQr0GiAN238dsmBJ6yo=; b=PKISnDKgsXsTfFJ4sgDNGFt9X/FukJ4ILSk7nzYhR/3JEY5bQn3rxFF+Im5dwzW/p0amv8 hq654eDgpIsVtR+SdQC/2FHBZCWoC82XEVO3Zl7TI+wCLU9YzdFunclBCnFY51vexodOa6 Da1P60w7E5JS1erfP04/xC3a39Lp/3k= X-MC-Unique: QlqoyUdePouWqsE8TZtvMQ-1 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717485520; x=1718090320; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kSWUo4sCXjrNOR0yu+FmZCYBkQr0GiAN238dsmBJ6yo=; b=EoNSKnvwAKm1ZuR/JC94XStrepcEKs2U2XhOmbyjzZjmSljs52veknUD/iN3kgBnTJ 13qV86859rGPjddjuCiAI50JmqalVWwSL6abBx26dKItJsb3Wxr9ANnEebQqabWo04r0 kzf/9yL+w9P8leReKNNdq4hmDMra2hvB5o128UI6AvhrNWSaSXpTQI+Er9Bhw6zRn+BR OiCmi3/BfJxctjEAxv8vaHgXOzWh6SZyC82UdSvrtOAdUNzocgxsINa2zP35orhh5KuB Hs9XEY2+jyr2r7JVoSRrYqgeYmN2JsoMqMD8rNr7wvkzt79i6WbTVEyCRtKaXgxQA9Ux 6VTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzwz9KqEMCX+chvaeyoMCPJj/MWral5KsKePMttKPZLubO2Gu0H V9wiIMNSRLwacxo6OjC5cWxqiedB3FD42uhInX0ST0owq4BEUhyAT9ofmu242FyeaRvcdwz9R9Q +EcrzCk1ewcrI+JE1a+jWAfNiSG2lZCdP+2s+eoYgU+/mAW/wU4iBpuap9tU9YGdpm3gU1M1qXL uO2m1RMrnn60un8uU2K87tr3sbSxNQXDGj+2wG X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ae8f:b0:a63:4ed6:beac with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a681fe4d9a1mr722276766b.8.1717485520597; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:18:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFp5zJ6aPDe1MZBE4mtzCzWtAok5a9J4jipTW0LaLYuKzVRBhQwqJH3Oq0/B7U+NRHTP6sOVA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ae8f:b0:a63:4ed6:beac with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a681fe4d9a1mr722275066b.8.1717485520124; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:18:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Paolo Bonzini To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: richard.henderson@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH 01/11] target/i386: fix pushed value of EFLAGS.RF Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:18:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20240604071833.962574-2-pbonzini@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.1 In-Reply-To: <20240604071833.962574-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> References: <20240604071833.962574-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @redhat.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1717485583661100005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" When preparing an exception stack frame for a fault exception, the value pushed for RF is 1. Take that into account. The same should be true of interrupts for repeated string instructions, but the situation there is complicated. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Acked-by: Richard Henderson --- target/i386/tcg/seg_helper.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- target/i386/tcg/translate.c | 8 ++++++ 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/seg_helper.c b/target/i386/tcg/seg_helper.c index 0301459004e..715db1f2326 100644 --- a/target/i386/tcg/seg_helper.c +++ b/target/i386/tcg/seg_helper.c @@ -526,6 +526,24 @@ static inline unsigned int get_sp_mask(unsigned int e2) } } =20 +static int exception_is_fault(int intno) +{ + switch (intno) { + /* + * #DB can be both fault- and trap-like, but it never sets RF=3D1 + * in the RFLAGS value pushed on the stack. + */ + case EXCP01_DB: + case EXCP03_INT3: + case EXCP04_INTO: + case EXCP08_DBLE: + case EXCP12_MCHK: + return 0; + } + /* Everything else including reserved exception is a fault. */ + return 1; +} + int exception_has_error_code(int intno) { switch (intno) { @@ -605,8 +623,9 @@ static void do_interrupt_protected(CPUX86State *env, in= t intno, int is_int, int type, dpl, selector, ss_dpl, cpl; int has_error_code, new_stack, shift; uint32_t e1, e2, offset, ss =3D 0, esp, ss_e1 =3D 0, ss_e2 =3D 0; - uint32_t old_eip, sp_mask; + uint32_t old_eip, sp_mask, eflags; int vm86 =3D env->eflags & VM_MASK; + bool set_rf; =20 has_error_code =3D 0; if (!is_int && !is_hw) { @@ -614,8 +633,10 @@ static void do_interrupt_protected(CPUX86State *env, i= nt intno, int is_int, } if (is_int) { old_eip =3D next_eip; + set_rf =3D false; } else { old_eip =3D env->eip; + set_rf =3D exception_is_fault(intno); } =20 dt =3D &env->idt; @@ -748,6 +769,15 @@ static void do_interrupt_protected(CPUX86State *env, i= nt intno, int is_int, } push_size <<=3D shift; #endif + eflags =3D cpu_compute_eflags(env); + /* + * AMD states that code breakpoint #DBs clear RF=3D0, Intel leaves it + * as is. AMD behavior could be implemented in check_hw_breakpoints(). + */ + if (set_rf) { + eflags |=3D RF_MASK; + } + if (shift =3D=3D 1) { if (new_stack) { if (vm86) { @@ -759,7 +789,7 @@ static void do_interrupt_protected(CPUX86State *env, in= t intno, int is_int, PUSHL(ssp, esp, sp_mask, env->segs[R_SS].selector); PUSHL(ssp, esp, sp_mask, env->regs[R_ESP]); } - PUSHL(ssp, esp, sp_mask, cpu_compute_eflags(env)); + PUSHL(ssp, esp, sp_mask, eflags); PUSHL(ssp, esp, sp_mask, env->segs[R_CS].selector); PUSHL(ssp, esp, sp_mask, old_eip); if (has_error_code) { @@ -776,7 +806,7 @@ static void do_interrupt_protected(CPUX86State *env, in= t intno, int is_int, PUSHW(ssp, esp, sp_mask, env->segs[R_SS].selector); PUSHW(ssp, esp, sp_mask, env->regs[R_ESP]); } - PUSHW(ssp, esp, sp_mask, cpu_compute_eflags(env)); + PUSHW(ssp, esp, sp_mask, eflags); PUSHW(ssp, esp, sp_mask, env->segs[R_CS].selector); PUSHW(ssp, esp, sp_mask, old_eip); if (has_error_code) { @@ -868,8 +898,9 @@ static void do_interrupt64(CPUX86State *env, int intno,= int is_int, target_ulong ptr; int type, dpl, selector, cpl, ist; int has_error_code, new_stack; - uint32_t e1, e2, e3, ss; + uint32_t e1, e2, e3, ss, eflags; target_ulong old_eip, esp, offset; + bool set_rf; =20 has_error_code =3D 0; if (!is_int && !is_hw) { @@ -877,8 +908,10 @@ static void do_interrupt64(CPUX86State *env, int intno= , int is_int, } if (is_int) { old_eip =3D next_eip; + set_rf =3D false; } else { old_eip =3D env->eip; + set_rf =3D exception_is_fault(intno); } =20 dt =3D &env->idt; @@ -950,9 +983,15 @@ static void do_interrupt64(CPUX86State *env, int intno= , int is_int, } esp &=3D ~0xfLL; /* align stack */ =20 + /* See do_interrupt_protected. */ + eflags =3D cpu_compute_eflags(env); + if (set_rf) { + eflags |=3D RF_MASK; + } + PUSHQ(esp, env->segs[R_SS].selector); PUSHQ(esp, env->regs[R_ESP]); - PUSHQ(esp, cpu_compute_eflags(env)); + PUSHQ(esp, eflags); PUSHQ(esp, env->segs[R_CS].selector); PUSHQ(esp, old_eip); if (has_error_code) { diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c index 0486ab69112..d438f8f76f7 100644 --- a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c +++ b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c @@ -4630,6 +4630,14 @@ static void i386_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextB= ase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu) * If jmp_opt, we want to handle each string instruction individually. * For icount also disable repz optimization so that each iteration * is accounted separately. + * + * FIXME: this is messy; it makes REP string instructions a lot less + * efficient than they should be and it gets in the way of correct + * handling of RF (interrupts or traps arriving after any iteration + * of a repeated string instruction but the last should set RF to 1). + * Perhaps it would be more efficient if REP string instructions were + * always at the beginning of the TB, or even their own TB? That + * would even allow accounting up to 64k iterations at once for icount. */ dc->repz_opt =3D !dc->jmp_opt && !(cflags & CF_USE_ICOUNT); =20 --=20 2.45.1