From nobody Mon Feb 9 19:06:11 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1711031459; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=RvFJg9ZPyB5+CAPdzFNbtrMULLlhgIuOpEgwvD9jYHFVpXwaxQ4RifqW65DbozNBlpos8me7AVtjgfeRfpeY/5NjHl8zCgg4ROiHcz4noKcddjFRvVnTe2ZTrt++U+3jNye59iAVG0IhNp0jSsFRt0JEV/hPpoGpAvpBFLvPN8s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1711031459; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=VWg+vCICVsqXCZ7ys/6enB2iFUs2BY5+7BGrbhxOMIc=; b=IfzIYYAe2kSywLz1JMp+l30+TD/74qBeMmIGj18Y6F7E8QOS6tNkHMtaPD5gci4uRQ+GupWLrPotFXe/u1jU5OUIOZPOQX7KcVou7Tk+Q43zQGPq/qjc1ZcyY5nM88d//7czAWwcFsPCKIE9FE4enboQ1PgjTTwxTldGYZwadx0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1711031459351743.6589874279364; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnJP0-0008Qg-Bd; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:28:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnJOy-0008Q8-DY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:28:16 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.15]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnJOv-0002rG-Lw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:28:16 -0400 Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2024 07:28:13 -0700 Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2024 07:28:08 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711031294; x=1742567294; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lnijkzk6Qfg24tQGPl1L9Sow5hvow7RxZfOVxF2Uz0k=; b=nopo0el1cXsZYvTVmmtsZnD379SpecqErGRyXBSpY00ie1qND3QHAaq7 RumwkzkUdwjT9L42J9bUi5gvQOHG7zKwPb4FZOL7aWvrIGDkExhNXv8LF rdHylMbps/jbWzop9rfqlVquyOgC+s6mYGyDtznGW1FU6KaZNE7VZdUUz AyQLXWqzwGHWRF3SGPZnCkVr8apKEVwTb/xROuJubkDAdyvBQA2ZnpNgB xcGvtN1SCF82OKNRrANsyj92H+wiwzidcwJ9QuSVwY3KI4Wfd3EubbjrD nAUAUrkFBpaISIpudyH7FPknCGH8xDqvMtlOtTFNIFOMi4hhJvbnnVlEj g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11020"; a="9806528" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,143,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="9806528" X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,143,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="14528152" From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Marcelo Tosatti , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Xiaoyao Li Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Zhuocheng Ding , Babu Moger , Yongwei Ma , Zhao Liu Subject: [PATCH v10 12/21] i386: Introduce module level cpu topology to CPUX86State Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:40:39 +0800 Message-Id: <20240321144048.3699388-13-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321144048.3699388-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20240321144048.3699388-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: none client-ip=198.175.65.15; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.372, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @intel.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1711031460699100001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Zhao Liu Intel CPUs implement module level on hybrid client products (e.g., ADL-N, MTL, etc) and E-core server products. A module contains a set of cores that share certain resources (in current products, the resource usually includes L2 cache, as well as module scoped features and MSRs). Module level support is the prerequisite for L2 cache topology on module level. With module level, we can implement the Guest's CPU topology and future cache topology to be consistent with the Host's on Intel hybrid client/E-core server platforms. Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Co-developed-by: Zhuocheng Ding Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Tested-by: Babu Moger --- Changes since v7: * Mapped x86 module to smp module instead of cluster. * Re-wrote the commit message to explain the reason why we needs module level. * Dropped Michael/Babu's ACKed/Tested tags since the code change. * Re-added Yongwei's Tested tag For his re-testing. Changes since v1: * The background of the introduction of the "cluster" parameter and its exact meaning were revised according to Yanan's explanation. (Yanan) --- hw/i386/x86.c | 5 +++++ target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/cpu.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c index 0a6c59c724f1..7c94d366af03 100644 --- a/hw/i386/x86.c +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c @@ -313,6 +313,11 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, =20 init_topo_info(&topo_info, x86ms); =20 + if (ms->smp.modules > 1) { + env->nr_modules =3D ms->smp.modules; + /* TODO: Expose module level in CPUID[0x1F]. */ + } + if (ms->smp.dies > 1) { env->nr_dies =3D ms->smp.dies; set_bit(CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE, env->avail_cpu_topo); diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c index 92d85e920015..b8917c412175 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.c +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c @@ -7717,6 +7717,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_init_default_topo(X86CPU *cpu) { CPUX86State *env =3D &cpu->env; =20 + env->nr_modules =3D 1; env->nr_dies =3D 1; =20 /* SMT, core and package levels are set by default. */ diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h index 2e24f457468d..095540e58f7a 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.h +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h @@ -1899,6 +1899,9 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState { /* Number of dies within this CPU package. */ unsigned nr_dies; =20 + /* Number of modules within one die. */ + unsigned nr_modules; + /* Bitmap of available CPU topology levels for this CPU. */ DECLARE_BITMAP(avail_cpu_topo, CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX); } CPUX86State; --=20 2.34.1