From nobody Tue Nov 26 06:47:59 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709697742; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=HHwK5K5pH30wXCDU0uKN3wBfxqd3l1XKoGyBXLhKFZ3mDz+7yuhVH7sOdt14hr3gaxYj+GbhErTS4F2tw+qwmO16JRjdks9VBkZSmJMS4oDaZFEWtPPi4B7/FpFwhgMV1qy2bT++lModQWv13T+4nEVcQUhlRrsLY/BzNiSUg1U= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1709697742; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id; bh=M2Uy5i5qvzpAhvD2FgxT9EaUlBDilD6t9YUoZwRT2Xw=; b=fHkz6/Qe5qVW+ezCe5qv58GWoiAqEVfXQawQfc9yvpFVkMWrBs0Beh9oWFQf72voa76hiSvqHSJZykDZ6++n157JrEHsAT89PfrCWM7abxvDQyuhlVGSb1R4jfXorg5NiLibiGFysSIOHLHLjAXOYw6FNiNzEUycv33UIYi4Y8g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1709697742217431.7628176884591; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 20:02:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rhiQR-0000pM-8V; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 22:58:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rhiQP-0000oA-Ja; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 22:58:37 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rhiQN-0006kp-Ir; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 22:58:37 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.194]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TqJX33gkxzsWq8; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:56:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03A1A14040F; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:58:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:58:32 +0800 To: , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v7 07/23] target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el() Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:57:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20240306035721.2333531-8-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240306035721.2333531-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240306035721.2333531-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.187; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga01-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan From: Jinjie Ruan via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1709697743330100003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so handle NMI same as IRQ in arm_phys_excp_target_el(). Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Add Reviewed-by. v3: - Remove nmi_is_irq flag in CPUARMState. - Handle NMI same as IRQ in arm_phys_excp_target_el(). --- target/arm/helper.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 4b4c8e279d..7cdc90e9e3 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -10570,6 +10570,7 @@ uint32_t arm_phys_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs, uint= 32_t excp_idx, hcr_el2 =3D arm_hcr_el2_eff(env); switch (excp_idx) { case EXCP_IRQ: + case EXCP_NMI: scr =3D ((env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_IRQ) =3D=3D SCR_IRQ); hcr =3D hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO; break; --=20 2.34.1