From nobody Tue Nov 26 08:47:29 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709212665; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=RcKByfeXSOOVuWJcc9SziWutobMSVXwzSroZ3A7J7Sm389cPgOpvYiiI3YhHXslgpf6CxSHQ843kKmjrW15ZlCs9VFLP9jSpgpemWKnATgNBtpqtKbqjTvj9UXeLPoqIk9eU1DMop2xCJIHlqDrwy7Qr9bmwpOFRBMLUgwTf3XQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1709212665; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id; bh=uv64HG1jVdpzC89HUbnMNV9mkiZRVPERLXPKwljNfBs=; b=EhYtCJdUWxLIstC3qQ9t3yuWucIT7+yj9jBV/ESsPBLfdC+dyh7gox8YfIsOJZ0DtW4wRqrDFS4jMGDIhiq3arfh39t4ogj0lNhZEUmYwZvaDEo5wYWFDNayHILWm7shgb4BfFaSslbsalxrxPeWY19zgD1/NzJ6vsXU9WIiFyM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1709212665034869.5169120693399; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:17:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfgD5-0005u9-Rp; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:12:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfgCf-0005hI-Av; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:12:02 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfgCd-0002ho-Ow; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:12:01 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Tls513JGTz1h13f; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:09:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C2DC14037D; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:11:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:11:56 +0800 To: , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 19/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update() Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:10:36 +0000 Message-ID: <20240229131039.1868904-20-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240229131039.1868904-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240229131039.1868904-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan From: Jinjie Ruan via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1709212666198100003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In CPU Interface, if the IRQ has the superpriority property, report NMI to the corresponding PE. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Swap the ordering of the IFs. v3: - Remove handling nmi_is_irq flag. --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c index df82a413c6..afba98ad87 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) /* Tell the CPU about its highest priority pending interrupt */ int irqlevel =3D 0; int fiqlevel =3D 0; + int nmilevel =3D 0; ARMCPU *cpu =3D ARM_CPU(cs->cpu); CPUARMState *env =3D &cpu->env; =20 @@ -976,6 +977,8 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) =20 if (isfiq) { fiqlevel =3D 1; + } else if (cs->hppi.superprio) { + nmilevel =3D 1; } else { irqlevel =3D 1; } @@ -985,6 +988,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) =20 qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_fiq, fiqlevel); qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_irq, irqlevel); + qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_nmi, nmilevel); } =20 static uint64_t icc_pmr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) --=20 2.34.1