From nobody Tue Nov 26 10:37:53 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709112906; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=YXv7RaubWVZMdM+aufVpPxDI0vLZB8fSiBTbL28AZwwCe/ITDBaE8LxPtQjmbzGjYZLIwPsmltxB295pt2lSR0cQbUY6KSOz4PCJgKDTx7UDAFM0UEi99xakGQAcim14v1sczjeHrHJh21kLgbEZtlTm/HSVPcTF5X5TPiJZP0g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1709112906; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id; bh=M2Uy5i5qvzpAhvD2FgxT9EaUlBDilD6t9YUoZwRT2Xw=; b=ZH3e7QF6SACFjBevZMO+v0+71iPoRC2FPSlDsL1G64ptFFtUxpoVnbzkfq1gbIUEnexTsc2fIJZ8WyKULkyFZWjOtTgFXrPXNpbSxOciE5eJDgwk56zR0cO70ZinVpgY3WO7nxdqPzDKblkgObFF7BOiJmeVhclDqhKJZjdTBT0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1709112906083243.81481528693098; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 01:35:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfGHi-0001MM-Ku; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 04:31:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfGHN-00011e-BM; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 04:31:09 -0500 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.189]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfGHK-0001WH-7t; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 04:31:08 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.174]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Tl8FK5T05zNlnx; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:29:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DF4140414; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:30:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:30:55 +0800 To: , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 07/22] target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el() Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:29:31 +0000 Message-ID: <20240228092946.1768728-8-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240228092946.1768728-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240228092946.1768728-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.189; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga03-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan From: Jinjie Ruan via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1709112908014100007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so handle NMI same as IRQ in arm_phys_excp_target_el(). Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Add Reviewed-by. v3: - Remove nmi_is_irq flag in CPUARMState. - Handle NMI same as IRQ in arm_phys_excp_target_el(). --- target/arm/helper.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 4b4c8e279d..7cdc90e9e3 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -10570,6 +10570,7 @@ uint32_t arm_phys_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs, uint= 32_t excp_idx, hcr_el2 =3D arm_hcr_el2_eff(env); switch (excp_idx) { case EXCP_IRQ: + case EXCP_NMI: scr =3D ((env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_IRQ) =3D=3D SCR_IRQ); hcr =3D hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO; break; --=20 2.34.1