From nobody Tue Nov 26 09:47:59 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709029256; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=Hf4Cn7xeGBP/NG5miYsopehxVyR/1C55o5bn1O+NKJfBeT/UG9FTfwKWCmHPbVCxnLTFNDI+j7vaux3LaY6SgB7FNMcsDXKq+5FZXXVpA4mId5lYgQeIOXCjZ+kzHBmmdd70kGp5HJOY7Cd9G8Cx2dI6vvJmok/Ciw2COHnijZg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1709029256; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=IaUmop3tfeahyBNm+SernVUZInbEItEppMJbsatB8Wc=; b=BlULHtWGR5ifemioB4lT+araUIrnf8RbJF/UYs7dm6764WSiPWQdu8B0GWILZ5HKhHAtLcbBMXYvz+tQTqzjZlzHoR0jEJhXtPJT2NawnPnCnDKbhB4Bzpbhp4DCzYsLMxf/5neGgPn6Z0gSpjE/NMvX7RpRI5TeG9ympM2qODs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1709029256880783.6011073340753; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:20:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reuZc-0007vL-JS; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 05:20:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reuZa-0007el-7j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 05:20:30 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.13]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reuZX-0003hl-Nj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 05:20:29 -0500 Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2024 02:20:16 -0800 Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2024 02:20:12 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709029227; x=1740565227; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2cHMC5a5BJRlD/PsC4aspwTroLUP40TmuAMHURKso6g=; b=OMHCa5NwRz0Kp0oYd2aIjpBYKwCIdi8tM6Sh1Y2kme/DUD0zNZJTGx3V ioDO3R15xoi9+kK6gktnFoYuaaNw47Igz9BYHZYE6gExQ18ZEe3GI4bc0 gDKJjhL10AmkE98jtc+7L36cwNbqDCYCE6uZYJzbAX0CejOkMypWk80JT jmABL/oMEwCtKe3EvHliLN7Rwu6LkOf0tPUNdobTYmtSp1iWjmF/8O9L+ boGVRkya3KrE0TMh0YSoxv6aTGjimwcHsE9n+moMKT1sqL0LWG5Uvf016 8F9Jckncq6l5n6HAZDyIn77y61olJza/uVYCueNBdTsRenn7QKlk5X1J+ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10996"; a="6310447" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,187,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="6310447" X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,187,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="6955148" From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Marcelo Tosatti , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Xiaoyao Li Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Zhuocheng Ding , Babu Moger , Yongwei Ma , Zhao Liu Subject: [PATCH v9 17/21] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:32:27 +0800 Message-Id: <20240227103231.1556302-18-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240227103231.1556302-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20240227103231.1556302-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: none client-ip=192.198.163.13; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.014, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @intel.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1709029258842100019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Zhuocheng Ding After i386 supports module level, it's time to add the test for module level's parsing. Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding Co-developed-by: Zhao Liu Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang Tested-by: Babu Moger Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c index f21b8a5d95c2..55b731ccae55 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 0); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 0); =20 topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; @@ -74,13 +75,22 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 33, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 6); =20 - topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 3); + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 7, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 3); + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 8, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 3); + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 9, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 4); + + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 0); - topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 1); - topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 2); - topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 2); =20 /* build a weird topology and see if IDs are calculated correctly @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info =3D (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 6, 3}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 2); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_offset(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 2); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_offset(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_offset(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info), =3D=3D, 5); =20 --=20 2.34.1