From nobody Tue Nov 26 08:21:44 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709029429; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=emkggka6UC00u6M5ICY/T4ArHaR15oiJEf5UHHgPPW/I9MzDZSFNigYToCj54gtc10OKN7Coh/e41aQbuY+yRZRH7sR6h4DZykkKgnhGf8Z648UgO8/CZ8X13yqt1Nxzyss0J9vO5OsHYr6slidGMGyYkc6BTfHOJFeA1tY6lK8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1709029429; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=HVcrJAACPPrVCAPRoXFD6XpPUCrj758hO4ajtZ0Ua+M=; b=G4XfWMiMFWSbmHS/mQwF/cchD5j05zux1JOLuC2EXmuRyPs030e+nP2waPCx6GtnJdjBBLzvNwZTCq6/gAJ6S6yD/NNkjAC0YPlVIof/ewhBAWPEbqG6PbxShkvaIbjQPJLKyHFBce7hMHhj9cKerFgUs6TFns7G0tnB/iFPsAg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1709029429405699.2898817999344; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:23:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reuZ2-000575-0h; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 05:19:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reuYx-0004YW-4j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 05:19:51 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.13]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reuYu-00036Z-LO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 05:19:50 -0500 Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2024 02:19:48 -0800 Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2024 02:19:43 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709029188; x=1740565188; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zBvla0lzdWqVQFhaKVwk9U6Zy1bFZecbtGApaEtmxUU=; b=lm5aOKTmIL+IB5F2qE2yUOGjX7BO/Geg93KfyTC91NJIkeFrAwChtfQK C413B92MWESRzILYxFVHrz8zp5+7Ei+cjnzDHJCRPBpqMcp0YWNTmlPEk 4Wrh9AVw+0UwK5ukZ/F7VvSvSho5Z0zRO/1nj+Bwc38KJ1+TflRoFrU3I ItMtYs8JvbpD96YO4k8cDo887+ZL9Y2KWKC0xF3Io0ciAOHbZR+z7ts92 da8elImdnccmoabvlBJDP6O9b/R+cNUedE/+Oh9OW27Rt1bSGB+XNttbH fLcCtFWys4E6waRAwm06Yfl9OQzavKAEHw/01Kyaq+8kdKr4PPUvpRKZF Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10996"; a="6310336" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,187,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="6310336" X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,187,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="6954879" From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Marcelo Tosatti , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Xiaoyao Li Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Zhuocheng Ding , Babu Moger , Yongwei Ma , Zhao Liu Subject: [PATCH v9 11/21] i386/cpu: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with specific topology level Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:32:21 +0800 Message-Id: <20240227103231.1556302-12-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240227103231.1556302-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20240227103231.1556302-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: none client-ip=192.198.163.13; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.014, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @intel.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1709029431394100003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Zhao Liu At present, the subleaf 0x02 of CPUID[0x1F] is bound to the "die" level. In fact, the specific topology level exposed in 0x1F depends on the platform's support for extension levels (module, tile and die). To help expose "module" level in 0x1F, decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with specific topology level. Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li --- Changes since v7: * Refactored the encode_topo_cpuid1f() to use traversal to search the encoded level and avoid using static variables. (Xiaoyao) - Since the total number of levels in the bitmap is not too large, the overhead of traversing is supposed to be acceptable. * Renamed the variable num_cpus_next_level to num_threads_next_level. (Xiaoyao) * Renamed the helper num_cpus_by_topo_level() to num_threads_by_topo_level(). (Xiaoyao) * Dropped Michael/Babu's Acked/Tested tags since the code change. * Re-added Yongwei's Tested tag For his re-testing. Changes since v3: * New patch to prepare to expose module level in 0x1F. * Moved the CPUTopoLevel enumeration definition from "i386: Add cache topology info in CPUCacheInfo" to this patch. Note, to align with topology types in SDM, revert the name of CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_UNKNOW to CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID. --- target/i386/cpu.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c index 88dffd2b52e3..b0f171c6a465 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.c +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c @@ -269,6 +269,118 @@ static void encode_cache_cpuid4(CPUCacheInfo *cache, (cache->complex_indexing ? CACHE_COMPLEX_IDX : 0); } =20 +static uint32_t num_threads_by_topo_level(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info, + enum CPUTopoLevel topo_level) +{ + switch (topo_level) { + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT: + return 1; + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE: + return topo_info->threads_per_core; + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE: + return topo_info->threads_per_core * topo_info->cores_per_die; + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE: + return topo_info->threads_per_core * topo_info->cores_per_die * + topo_info->dies_per_pkg; + default: + g_assert_not_reached(); + } + return 0; +} + +static uint32_t apicid_offset_by_topo_level(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info, + enum CPUTopoLevel topo_level) +{ + switch (topo_level) { + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT: + return 0; + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE: + return apicid_core_offset(topo_info); + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE: + return apicid_die_offset(topo_info); + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE: + return apicid_pkg_offset(topo_info); + default: + g_assert_not_reached(); + } + return 0; +} + +static uint32_t cpuid1f_topo_type(enum CPUTopoLevel topo_level) +{ + switch (topo_level) { + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID: + return CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID; + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT: + return CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT; + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE: + return CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE; + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE: + return CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE; + default: + /* Other types are not supported in QEMU. */ + g_assert_not_reached(); + } + return 0; +} + +static void encode_topo_cpuid1f(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t count, + X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info, + uint32_t *eax, uint32_t *ebx, + uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx) +{ + X86CPU *cpu =3D env_archcpu(env); + unsigned long level; + uint32_t num_threads_next_level, offset_next_level; + + assert(count + 1 < CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX); + + /* + * Find the No.count topology levels in avail_cpu_topo bitmap. + * Start from bit 0 (CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID). + */ + level =3D CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID; + for (int i =3D 0; i <=3D count; i++) { + level =3D find_next_bit(env->avail_cpu_topo, + CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE, + level + 1); + + /* + * CPUID[0x1f] doesn't explicitly encode the package level, + * and it just encode the invalid level (all fields are 0) + * into the last subleaf of 0x1f. + */ + if (level =3D=3D CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE) { + level =3D CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID; + break; + } + } + + if (level =3D=3D CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) { + num_threads_next_level =3D 0; + offset_next_level =3D 0; + } else { + unsigned long next_level; + + next_level =3D find_next_bit(env->avail_cpu_topo, + CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE, + level + 1); + num_threads_next_level =3D num_threads_by_topo_level(topo_info, + next_level); + offset_next_level =3D apicid_offset_by_topo_level(topo_info, + next_level); + } + + *eax =3D offset_next_level; + *ebx =3D num_threads_next_level; + *ebx &=3D 0xffff; /* The count doesn't need to be reliable. */ + *ecx =3D count & 0xff; + *ecx |=3D cpuid1f_topo_type(level) << 8; + *edx =3D cpu->apic_id; + + assert(!(*eax & ~0x1f)); +} + /* Encode cache info for CPUID[0x80000005].ECX or CPUID[0x80000005].EDX */ static uint32_t encode_cache_cpuid80000005(CPUCacheInfo *cache) { @@ -6287,31 +6399,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index,= uint32_t count, break; } =20 - *ecx =3D count & 0xff; - *edx =3D cpu->apic_id; - switch (count) { - case 0: - *eax =3D apicid_core_offset(&topo_info); - *ebx =3D topo_info.threads_per_core; - *ecx |=3D CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT << 8; - break; - case 1: - *eax =3D apicid_die_offset(&topo_info); - *ebx =3D topo_info.cores_per_die * topo_info.threads_per_core; - *ecx |=3D CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE << 8; - break; - case 2: - *eax =3D apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info); - *ebx =3D threads_per_pkg; - *ecx |=3D CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE << 8; - break; - default: - *eax =3D 0; - *ebx =3D 0; - *ecx |=3D CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID << 8; - } - assert(!(*eax & ~0x1f)); - *ebx &=3D 0xffff; /* The count doesn't need to be reliable. */ + encode_topo_cpuid1f(env, count, &topo_info, eax, ebx, ecx, edx); break; case 0xD: { /* Processor Extended State */ --=20 2.34.1