From nobody Tue Nov 26 14:53:03 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707256351; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=gqoJmvogytsNepOck77l58OcbStFRI3FQYHO3CXBxpt2SCuQ4tnpuzM4GWzReD+Kn7oIeHreNTO+MFVSt/whLmAqcb9Ziu0WJKvJQ7Ifxmz6/hS0HZgZcMKtcNE6RRnk/Kv1PUWhv37N1iXmtAOb9B4xym+ronLDfWNM5KsXmNQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1707256351; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=SWjOuEBMSM14dm/0EWXiK1u85r7duv2JIVEUTZ33GH8=; b=S5IIbIUiz8dZtrgRASRXLABifRoEOoN32K690yZkpVDM5NviclUPYe9DZ40+/l5ZGar8rgnV9m8Jo5pwrgHQ10XOyj2r4zwF0Mu/c7/Zj5zcyFS1SAyYYo44b43z8UnaA95ZZrDAMlrzuly+Kn+Bsqb+aHmvY7pNFDMHpfQ+Yow= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1707256351585121.68982023128001; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:52:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXTMh-0000gF-Ih; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 16:52:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXTLs-0008E2-MB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 16:51:39 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.223.131]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXTLq-00089y-2Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 16:51:36 -0500 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46211FB98; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 21:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65EA2132DD; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 21:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id EGkwC+OpwmWzQAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Tue, 06 Feb 2024 21:51:31 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707256292; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SWjOuEBMSM14dm/0EWXiK1u85r7duv2JIVEUTZ33GH8=; b=Ozk2fr+MdpDTk+bjt/kjESyHIIoWfw6XWbNMtVr3y3ToG66RpfyYCuqLnwAvyc5qq6n/1I p1cDIQII63+F9qHaBiYaCpQNND4+HehjAjk1Pzb5giAGrC8UYUSrEUOsz0PjMoONzOlDkN pRIvC8Zj5fWQW1CzsObfhZhv9L8btRg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707256292; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SWjOuEBMSM14dm/0EWXiK1u85r7duv2JIVEUTZ33GH8=; b=0wg6cqP4AQVvk5Ca8wf911m20izymSvA3ZMPSXO//4VGPQ8ErKSzbn169qDj5M23de3WP+ P9nIjkWx9NIO0/Ag== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1707256292; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SWjOuEBMSM14dm/0EWXiK1u85r7duv2JIVEUTZ33GH8=; b=Ozk2fr+MdpDTk+bjt/kjESyHIIoWfw6XWbNMtVr3y3ToG66RpfyYCuqLnwAvyc5qq6n/1I p1cDIQII63+F9qHaBiYaCpQNND4+HehjAjk1Pzb5giAGrC8UYUSrEUOsz0PjMoONzOlDkN pRIvC8Zj5fWQW1CzsObfhZhv9L8btRg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1707256292; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SWjOuEBMSM14dm/0EWXiK1u85r7duv2JIVEUTZ33GH8=; b=0wg6cqP4AQVvk5Ca8wf911m20izymSvA3ZMPSXO//4VGPQ8ErKSzbn169qDj5M23de3WP+ P9nIjkWx9NIO0/Ag== From: Fabiano Rosas To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Xu , Avihai Horon , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] migration/multifd: Unify multifd and TLS connection paths Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:51:17 -0300 Message-Id: <20240206215118.6171-6-farosas@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20240206215118.6171-1-farosas@suse.de> References: <20240206215118.6171-1-farosas@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.90 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; BROKEN_CONTENT_TYPE(1.50)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:email]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%] X-Spam-Score: 1.90 Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.223.131; envelope-from=farosas@suse.de; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @suse.de) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1707256352258100001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" During multifd channel creation (multifd_send_new_channel_async) when TLS is enabled, the multifd_channel_connect function is called twice, once to create the TLS handshake thread and another time after the asynchrounous TLS handshake has finished. This creates a slightly confusing call stack where multifd_channel_connect() is called more times than the number of channels. It also splits error handling between the two callers of multifd_channel_connect() causing some code duplication. Lastly, it gets in the way of having a single point to determine whether all channel creation tasks have been initiated. Refactor the code to move the reentrancy one level up at the multifd_new_send_channel_async() level, de-duplicating the error handling and allowing for the next patch to introduce a synchronization point common to all the multifd channel creation, regardless of TLS. Note that the previous code would never fail once p->c had been set. This patch changes this assumption, which affects refcounting, so add comments around object_unref to explain the situation. Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas --- migration/multifd.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c index cc10be2c3f..339f2428f3 100644 --- a/migration/multifd.c +++ b/migration/multifd.c @@ -869,30 +869,7 @@ out: return NULL; } =20 -static bool multifd_channel_connect(MultiFDSendParams *p, - QIOChannel *ioc, - Error **errp); - -static void multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake(QIOTask *task, - gpointer opaque) -{ - MultiFDSendParams *p =3D opaque; - QIOChannel *ioc =3D QIO_CHANNEL(qio_task_get_source(task)); - Error *err =3D NULL; - - if (!qio_task_propagate_error(task, &err)) { - trace_multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake_complete(ioc); - if (multifd_channel_connect(p, ioc, &err)) { - return; - } - } - - trace_multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake_error(ioc, error_get_pretty(err)); - - multifd_send_set_error(err); - multifd_send_kick_main(p); - error_free(err); -} +static void multifd_new_send_channel_async(QIOTask *task, gpointer opaque); =20 static void *multifd_tls_handshake_thread(void *opaque) { @@ -900,7 +877,7 @@ static void *multifd_tls_handshake_thread(void *opaque) QIOChannelTLS *tioc =3D QIO_CHANNEL_TLS(p->c); =20 qio_channel_tls_handshake(tioc, - multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake, + multifd_new_send_channel_async, p, NULL, NULL); @@ -920,6 +897,10 @@ static bool multifd_tls_channel_connect(MultiFDSendPar= ams *p, return false; } =20 + /* + * Ownership of the socket channel now transfers to the newly + * created TLS channel, which has already taken a reference. + */ object_unref(OBJECT(ioc)); trace_multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake_start(ioc, tioc, hostname); qio_channel_set_name(QIO_CHANNEL(tioc), "multifd-tls-outgoing"); @@ -936,18 +917,7 @@ static bool multifd_channel_connect(MultiFDSendParams = *p, QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp) { - trace_multifd_set_outgoing_channel( - ioc, object_get_typename(OBJECT(ioc)), - migrate_get_current()->hostname); - - if (migrate_channel_requires_tls_upgrade(ioc)) { - /* - * tls_channel_connect will call back to this - * function after the TLS handshake, - * so we mustn't call multifd_send_thread until then - */ - return multifd_tls_channel_connect(p, ioc, errp); - } + qio_channel_set_delay(ioc, false); =20 migration_ioc_register_yank(ioc); p->registered_yank =3D true; @@ -959,24 +929,51 @@ static bool multifd_channel_connect(MultiFDSendParams= *p, return true; } =20 +/* + * When TLS is enabled this function is called once to establish the + * TLS connection and a second time after the TLS handshake to create + * the multifd channel. Without TLS it goes straight into the channel + * creation. + */ static void multifd_new_send_channel_async(QIOTask *task, gpointer opaque) { MultiFDSendParams *p =3D opaque; QIOChannel *ioc =3D QIO_CHANNEL(qio_task_get_source(task)); Error *local_err =3D NULL; + bool ret; =20 trace_multifd_new_send_channel_async(p->id); - if (!qio_task_propagate_error(task, &local_err)) { - qio_channel_set_delay(ioc, false); - if (multifd_channel_connect(p, ioc, &local_err)) { - return; - } + + if (qio_task_propagate_error(task, &local_err)) { + ret =3D false; + goto out; + } + + trace_multifd_set_outgoing_channel(ioc, object_get_typename(OBJECT(ioc= )), + migrate_get_current()->hostname); + + if (migrate_channel_requires_tls_upgrade(ioc)) { + ret =3D multifd_tls_channel_connect(p, ioc, &local_err); + } else { + ret =3D multifd_channel_connect(p, ioc, &local_err); + } + + if (ret) { + return; } =20 +out: trace_multifd_new_send_channel_async_error(p->id, local_err); multifd_send_set_error(local_err); multifd_send_kick_main(p); - object_unref(OBJECT(ioc)); + if (!p->c) { + /* + * If no channel has been created, drop the initial + * reference. Otherwise cleanup happens at + * multifd_send_channel_destroy() + */ + object_unref(OBJECT(ioc)); + } error_free(local_err); } =20 --=20 2.35.3