From nobody Sat Sep 21 06:27:44 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704971487; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=imYfVXHlXgES2kMOmO5yBSCnlExiEpDwdsnZgiaKkqGymZPtcM2SvC5eFDkywy3Oy66pYXmRVH7hbw6R+sRLerOAOHKw2PhFpbjVCbrY+xEOJjt4DlKpwcclWvFlSYPBbNIP9unN6PnDKoIGg1w3Y0Cnucrl5nrJrKIikKpd9SI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1704971487; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To:Cc; bh=Ht2SfbwBAKAnjagPGJMRAPfEfW3fn0agSes/TIkhhrw=; b=A8tAP2ZXOjT69lawm5d8/Nx39vGEJUZwZ9SjG/mMMyuo8WSUJdJAZkpnyMv8iUnkOOIqTIvxjmCY+38wG32/UFWqQIyzswio2SmZk8NeFgZ1gmUDzm2ilqCcaxdVjfDs9cdEGXXjxuco2vcc4N8Qb3tVx1i2FvZS7lrUMQFVH+w= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 17049714878601013.5777501661759; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:11:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNssY-0001Rz-DP; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:05:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNssA-0001Mc-5J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:05:19 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNss8-0004RB-7H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:05:17 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cd5c55d6b8so44181831fa.3 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:05:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from orth.archaic.org.uk (orth.archaic.org.uk. [2001:8b0:1d0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v30-20020adf8b5e000000b0033690139ea5sm951323wra.44.2024.01.11.03.05.14 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:05:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1704971114; x=1705575914; darn=nongnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Ht2SfbwBAKAnjagPGJMRAPfEfW3fn0agSes/TIkhhrw=; b=HWfkWD4mfsJUYpz6KUZkuVHWtrWVKB9lzW68dUFhWMsjOvtwmf6UZg4iknN7LRZsNL NUtJCFYmq0YZqbYBlTmu11ognZV5JVw+AulQcEZtUQOTOpL1LG72o5k2EyjMrUxUy198 S1KDfdrHFx42up5Ifh72gSGalye7DBlhqJ+Jx/XJHVUhMisLI3EoJBd95nzvfV4QpUXN 3X+4nlJZV3JG+HLkjMKUnHjmyZMbSZBLhN4peZi+JL3CYhx4qMiK2WhGY5PJmnG9hB92 d99cUKzJoD8jBkSvmUd/l/ngXIcY+TWHLxmdTeaCg8kb2B4JTP4jEGDGjdCLsMxbii3Y BMvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704971114; x=1705575914; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ht2SfbwBAKAnjagPGJMRAPfEfW3fn0agSes/TIkhhrw=; b=ljftqOFM7bFrmnbUFm4pCeDHRhHFTx3hfzzXQLsv42MlEJhbUgc1Nz19a5SyzMjnvX bpnKQLO8L6vdu8ReRO2nLF3MYz6XiIIdZCAW+Bw0/I7g25zpjUGnxwA6V/HGYNRMI25r Et3A56Ypz5+8tnc7XI7FPrKk/Awz8P29/ulG3d4UFtT9w+RzhP47xrde3oTVl3rmg5pO yNr+2HpAwhv5mSHID2LIaA6RNjYJCxZiwg6A8DxmsE5cAi4Qn4ZQ8SKmxEeZZCDvAhOw A8fmrh9dcuC01FgeRoDw910wpru/dQygmsJUe1FQWobaJWdR/cA1Plb7mnKY7gwV6SuL ynPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzkGuId86u/amd29i9AdGXUcFAs6yTP70Z1eCow7vTv4sA4WiT1 wFT27u73JeNjzarx/cGDzVP0rpINd8BTlr7ctETYIuqD/c4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHja9/ptcLModQXlPT0+ZYdJ/ZP0AEnzq6buFaH19vyX5RtEavC7/8/OLABGZ+WanvljMkhwA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:317:b0:2cc:72e9:520 with SMTP id a23-20020a05651c031700b002cc72e90520mr189311ljp.44.1704971114574; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:05:14 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Maydell To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 18/41] target/arm: Move FPU/SVE/SME access checks up above ARM_CP_SPECIAL_MASK check Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:04:42 +0000 Message-Id: <20240111110505.1563291-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240111110505.1563291-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <20240111110505.1563291-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::231; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-lj1-x231.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @linaro.org) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1704971489706100003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In handle_sys() we don't do the check for whether the register is marked as needing an FPU/SVE/SME access check until after we've handled the special cases covered by ARM_CP_SPECIAL_MASK. This is conceptually the wrong way around, because if for example we happen to implement an FPU-access-checked register as ARM_CP_NOP, we should do the access check first. Move the access checks up so they are with all the other access checks, not sandwiched between the special-case read/write handling and the normal-case read/write handling. This doesn't change behaviour at the moment, because we happen not to define any cpregs with both ARM_CPU_{FPU,SVE,SME} and one of the cases dealt with by ARM_CP_SPECIAL_MASK. Moving this code also means we have the correct place to put the FEAT_NV/FEAT_NV2 access handling, which should come after the access checks and before we try to do any read/write action. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Tested-by: Miguel Luis --- target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c index 0f30e71f9bd..5975fc47930 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c +++ b/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c @@ -2190,6 +2190,14 @@ static void handle_sys(DisasContext *s, bool isread, gen_a64_update_pc(s, 0); } =20 + if ((ri->type & ARM_CP_FPU) && !fp_access_check_only(s)) { + return; + } else if ((ri->type & ARM_CP_SVE) && !sve_access_check(s)) { + return; + } else if ((ri->type & ARM_CP_SME) && !sme_access_check(s)) { + return; + } + /* Handle special cases first */ switch (ri->type & ARM_CP_SPECIAL_MASK) { case 0: @@ -2268,13 +2276,6 @@ static void handle_sys(DisasContext *s, bool isread, default: g_assert_not_reached(); } - if ((ri->type & ARM_CP_FPU) && !fp_access_check_only(s)) { - return; - } else if ((ri->type & ARM_CP_SVE) && !sve_access_check(s)) { - return; - } else if ((ri->type & ARM_CP_SME) && !sme_access_check(s)) { - return; - } =20 if (ri->type & ARM_CP_IO) { /* I/O operations must end the TB here (whether read or write) */ --=20 2.34.1