From nobody Sat Sep 21 06:52:08 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=reject dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704841752; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=YjMx0rr7MjJJnQmjmtpbQLV3C7I96E1vUQtu5uC0ZCGyMNIjpmEwYhM3egpaxmeiy62mUmRLS04H0xOxdVO51F/GUAecLLUtDpFTTGvfi02nO49/ifeS1CY4APE7Qcr8FkO+V3hAnPWjEmFv3Wq6yMntiPJON8/sCIPfuwsqVv0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1704841752; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=Epq4/2IrxAEyKNucGP8jLu0j7rl0e55OIlmgNSesLlI=; b=KVVwfuyqw8AW+Iu6RSPFpmosNy7xwarfFP/u60xicf9/dhLume+tAiutzY4sEx5LbLnCjhXZLaRkHnGwm62mnBNSE1jIERAaMMZ5Cz2beGvDGrJNs0NE5xC3P8L63239ZgVKABIMKG7oqIpzHlxWc01yarZx9KoVUW+JEqOoLe0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=reject dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1704841752209692.2516977105181; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:09:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNLCp-0003Rk-DD; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:08:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNLCn-0003Q0-DS; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:08:21 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNLCl-0006RR-AO; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:08:21 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0353723.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 409KkfUC015417; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:08:16 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vhbvnn1n3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:08:15 +0000 Received: from m0353723.ppops.net (m0353723.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 409N8FMV022099; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:08:15 GMT Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vhbvnn1mt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:08:15 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 409LLbfC028052; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:08:14 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vgwfsnqmf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:08:14 +0000 Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.106]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 409N8Cwh25559460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:08:12 GMT Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C322004B; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:08:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00AE20040; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:08:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heavy.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.60.193]) by smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:08:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Epq4/2IrxAEyKNucGP8jLu0j7rl0e55OIlmgNSesLlI=; b=LITHvL9GCGDrp5IEtrXjIz9pwA82IHn4d9EaU5N7kAVKOZfNBX+6jYsbR742gLBFgudq M7Mmn0l1s4Q3d5YfESIKTNMW9uantX0Cy8zFNDbPAURXczCtohbJPz1nCmLKhFVmzHku 1eJQD7Zl8Cb9dWjVpoy6gL91gxZD7Cgwle0DsHCahBdMhgEVrU+Qv3HxvO1nC2v8dIS7 iPVxbwELBeSnVSApD9phj+lzN8eRNorSS09ErCtemV27YHIWsQHz6rdc3EZ0Fr0A16DO y/on+evgOLvKPpFphwPMd85PDIIdtx04sj5fL+FTTKWQjfVQlbQxuCcsFgUAw48gnjAz Fg== From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Richard Henderson , Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= , David Hildenbrand Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Ilya Leoshkevich Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] linux-user: Allow gdbstub to ignore page protection Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:05:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20240109230808.583012-2-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240109230808.583012-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240109230808.583012-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: L_cNUuJwUs8NaX2bEdLCCe4J_xJxTo7k X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: A322wC64wfNUMpPpvhlpJeuMkgJPi93p X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-01-09_11,2024-01-09_02,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=962 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2401090186 Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.158.5; envelope-from=iii@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @ibm.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1704841753325100002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" gdbserver ignores page protection by virtue of using /proc/$pid/mem. Teach qemu gdbstub to do this too. This will not work if /proc is not mounted; accept this limitation. One alternative is to temporarily grant the missing PROT_* bit, but this is inherently racy. Another alternative is self-debugging with ptrace(POKE), which will break if QEMU itself is being debugged - a much more severe limitation. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- cpu-target.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu-target.c b/cpu-target.c index 5eecd7ea2d7..723f6af5fba 100644 --- a/cpu-target.c +++ b/cpu-target.c @@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cpu, vaddr addr, vaddr l, page; void * p; uint8_t *buf =3D ptr; + ssize_t written; + int ret =3D -1; + int fd =3D -1; =20 while (len > 0) { page =3D addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK; @@ -413,30 +416,73 @@ int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cpu, vaddr addr, if (l > len) l =3D len; flags =3D page_get_flags(page); - if (!(flags & PAGE_VALID)) - return -1; + if (!(flags & PAGE_VALID)) { + goto out_close; + } if (is_write) { - if (!(flags & PAGE_WRITE)) - return -1; - /* XXX: this code should not depend on lock_user */ - if (!(p =3D lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, l, 0))) - return -1; - memcpy(p, buf, l); - unlock_user(p, addr, l); - } else { - if (!(flags & PAGE_READ)) - return -1; + if (flags & PAGE_WRITE) { + /* XXX: this code should not depend on lock_user */ + p =3D lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, l, 0); + if (!p) { + goto out_close; + } + memcpy(p, buf, l); + unlock_user(p, addr, l); + } else { + /* Bypass the host page protection using ptrace. */ + if (fd =3D=3D -1) { + fd =3D open("/proc/self/mem", O_WRONLY); + if (fd =3D=3D -1) { + goto out; + } + } + /* + * If there is a TranslationBlock and we weren't bypassing= the + * host page protection, the memcpy() above would SEGV, + * ultimately leading to page_unprotect(). So invalidate t= he + * translations manually. Both invalidation and pwrite() m= ust + * be under mmap_lock() in order to prevent the creation of + * another TranslationBlock in between. + */ + mmap_lock(); + tb_invalidate_phys_range(addr, addr + l - 1); + written =3D pwrite(fd, buf, l, (off_t)g2h_untagged(addr)); + mmap_unlock(); + if (written !=3D l) { + goto out_close; + } + } + } else if (flags & PAGE_READ) { /* XXX: this code should not depend on lock_user */ - if (!(p =3D lock_user(VERIFY_READ, addr, l, 1))) - return -1; + p =3D lock_user(VERIFY_READ, addr, l, 1); + if (!p) { + goto out_close; + } memcpy(buf, p, l); unlock_user(p, addr, 0); + } else { + /* Bypass the host page protection using ptrace. */ + if (fd =3D=3D -1) { + fd =3D open("/proc/self/mem", O_RDONLY); + if (fd =3D=3D -1) { + goto out; + } + } + if (pread(fd, buf, l, (off_t)g2h_untagged(addr)) !=3D l) { + goto out_close; + } } len -=3D l; buf +=3D l; addr +=3D l; } - return 0; + ret =3D 0; +out_close: + if (fd !=3D -1) { + close(fd); + } +out: + return ret; } #endif =20 --=20 2.43.0