From nobody Thu Nov 28 11:03:30 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1692804924; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=KPJ+IkXc5tpHCDpAFBKCuwghLFethvYh7KV6xy3QlrWkkVgst1mrp9H1zonSHX9ujfnKz1gwkkx3qyCeEMIw2zISBA9erYvkP5Z9F91JpRNisi3NXKIuL9TLxaY6LTnIU9C9/8xD+8ib9iajOX2MtiX8kj1wq6efht0w1i9WzC8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1692804924; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To; bh=OYmUdM9xnUxYUikMjy3S8zQ+vg85pGF8BhztC9qJ42Y=; b=F+uNA1osVIv4qH0pK9ksPsWTGov0ieiTgExQiF2tmwWEArPtaGxdMmy5ZLSURiecfjJCEaPDLABRFARiDM53RjCqwzXKiILtQOHtGGd8UCh93YCoR6VzGj5196xbKxqHKe6M7AAcA1a6cCpznHRtJz+00whWc0e53fTMImKWZ50= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=pass header.from= (p=none dis=none) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1692804923679672.7966779210178; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 08:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYpsg-0001yn-EA; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:34:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYpsG-0001sz-3U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:34:24 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qYpsD-0007r0-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:34:23 -0400 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-323-DjnJofkYP9-s-tVund76sw-1; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:34:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6499101AA62; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t14s.fritz.box (unknown [10.39.193.128]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AAA1121314; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:34:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1692804861; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OYmUdM9xnUxYUikMjy3S8zQ+vg85pGF8BhztC9qJ42Y=; b=XRoSiPKgIEHAGOMXcCZYgOkRml3iVKjq43GJS9W4cyb9GKby1ruSVyILlinzKPL5kFq1Ly bgPwKCWT5hhvebqkRPyVTt2+JB7DsRXEeh02QAZEb14NeJmhOxKb9rA4CvkGp11c9HZKRz o23RJFMiunNfjWzraSaqnoDGkZj662E= X-MC-Unique: DjnJofkYP9-s-tVund76sw-1 From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Xu , Igor Mammedov , Thiner Logoer , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Stefan Hajnoczi , Elena Ufimtseva , Jagannathan Raman , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ani Sinha , Xiao Guangrong , Daniel Henrique Barboza , Greg Kurz , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Eduardo Habkost Subject: [PATCH v3 01/11] nvdimm: Reject writing label data to ROM instead of crashing QEMU Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:34:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20230823153412.832081-2-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20230823153412.832081-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20230823153412.832081-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZohoMail-DKIM: pass (identity @redhat.com) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1692804925485100004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Currently, when using a true R/O NVDIMM (ROM memory backend) with a label area, the VM can easily crash QEMU by trying to write to the label area, because the ROM memory is mmap'ed without PROT_WRITE. [root@vm-0 ~]# ndctl disable-region region0 disabled 1 region [root@vm-0 ~]# ndctl zero-labels nmem0 -> QEMU segfaults Let's remember whether we have a ROM memory backend and properly reject the write request: [root@vm-0 ~]# ndctl disable-region region0 disabled 1 region [root@vm-0 ~]# ndctl zero-labels nmem0 zeroed 0 nmem In comparison, on a system with a R/W NVDIMM: [root@vm-0 ~]# ndctl disable-region region0 disabled 1 region [root@vm-0 ~]# ndctl zero-labels nmem0 zeroed 1 nmem For ACPI, just return "unsupported", like if no label exists. For spapr, return "H_P2", similar to when no label area exists. Could we rely on the "unarmed" property? Maybe, but it looks cleaner to only disallow what certainly cannot work. After all "unarmed=3Don" primarily means: cannot accept persistent writes. = In theory, there might be setups where devices with "unarmed=3Don" set could be used to host non-persistent data (temporary files, system RAM, ...); for example, in Linux, admins can overwrite the "readonly" setting and still write to the device -- which will work as long as we're not using ROM. Allowing writing label data in such configurations can make sense. Fixes: dbd730e85987 ("nvdimm: check -object memory-backend-file, readonly= =3Don option") Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 11 ++++++++--- hw/mem/nvdimm.c | 10 +++++++--- hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c | 3 ++- include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c index a3b25a92f3..3cbd41629d 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c @@ -670,7 +670,8 @@ static void nvdimm_dsm_label_size(NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm,= hwaddr dsm_mem_addr) } =20 static uint32_t nvdimm_rw_label_data_check(NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm, - uint32_t offset, uint32_t lengt= h) + uint32_t offset, uint32_t lengt= h, + bool is_write) { uint32_t ret =3D NVDIMM_DSM_RET_STATUS_INVALID; =20 @@ -690,6 +691,10 @@ static uint32_t nvdimm_rw_label_data_check(NVDIMMDevic= e *nvdimm, return ret; } =20 + if (is_write && nvdimm->readonly) { + return NVDIMM_DSM_RET_STATUS_UNSUPPORT; + } + return NVDIMM_DSM_RET_STATUS_SUCCESS; } =20 @@ -713,7 +718,7 @@ static void nvdimm_dsm_get_label_data(NVDIMMDevice *nvd= imm, NvdimmDsmIn *in, get_label_data->length); =20 status =3D nvdimm_rw_label_data_check(nvdimm, get_label_data->offset, - get_label_data->length); + get_label_data->length, false); if (status !=3D NVDIMM_DSM_RET_STATUS_SUCCESS) { nvdimm_dsm_no_payload(status, dsm_mem_addr); return; @@ -752,7 +757,7 @@ static void nvdimm_dsm_set_label_data(NVDIMMDevice *nvd= imm, NvdimmDsmIn *in, set_label_data->length); =20 status =3D nvdimm_rw_label_data_check(nvdimm, set_label_data->offset, - set_label_data->length); + set_label_data->length, true); if (status !=3D NVDIMM_DSM_RET_STATUS_SUCCESS) { nvdimm_dsm_no_payload(status, dsm_mem_addr); return; diff --git a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c index 31080c22c9..1631a7d13f 100644 --- a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c +++ b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c @@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ static void nvdimm_prepare_memory_region(NVDIMMDevice *= nvdimm, Error **errp) object_get_canonical_path_component(OBJECT(hostmem))); return; } + if (memory_region_is_rom(mr)) { + nvdimm->readonly =3D true; + } =20 nvdimm->nvdimm_mr =3D g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); memory_region_init_alias(nvdimm->nvdimm_mr, OBJECT(dimm), @@ -207,15 +210,16 @@ static void nvdimm_unrealize(PCDIMMDevice *dimm) * label read/write functions. */ static void nvdimm_validate_rw_label_data(NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm, uint64_t s= ize, - uint64_t offset) + uint64_t offset, bool is_write) { assert((nvdimm->label_size >=3D size + offset) && (offset + size > off= set)); + assert(!is_write || !nvdimm->readonly); } =20 static void nvdimm_read_label_data(NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm, void *buf, uint64_t size, uint64_t offset) { - nvdimm_validate_rw_label_data(nvdimm, size, offset); + nvdimm_validate_rw_label_data(nvdimm, size, offset, false); =20 memcpy(buf, nvdimm->label_data + offset, size); } @@ -229,7 +233,7 @@ static void nvdimm_write_label_data(NVDIMMDevice *nvdim= m, const void *buf, "pmem", NULL); uint64_t backend_offset; =20 - nvdimm_validate_rw_label_data(nvdimm, size, offset); + nvdimm_validate_rw_label_data(nvdimm, size, offset, true); =20 if (!is_pmem) { memcpy(nvdimm->label_data + offset, buf, size); diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c index a8688243a6..60d6d0acc0 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c @@ -320,7 +320,8 @@ static target_ulong h_scm_write_metadata(PowerPCCPU *cp= u, =20 nvdimm =3D NVDIMM(drc->dev); if ((offset + len < offset) || - (nvdimm->label_size < len + offset)) { + (nvdimm->label_size < len + offset) || + nvdimm->readonly) { return H_P2; } =20 diff --git a/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h b/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h index acf887c83d..d3b763453a 100644 --- a/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h +++ b/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h @@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ struct NVDIMMDevice { */ bool unarmed; =20 + /* + * Whether our DIMM is backed by ROM, and even label data cannot be + * written. If set, implies that "unarmed" is also set. + */ + bool readonly; + /* * The PPC64 - spapr requires each nvdimm device have a uuid. */ --=20 2.41.0