From nobody Fri May 17 10:34:35 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1643638304700102.50008085743752; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 06:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEXPD-0008JZ-Bj for importer@patchew.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:11:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEWEu-0002as-Cw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:57:01 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:56009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEWER-0005JS-7f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:56:32 -0500 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-113-wFQ6IsBbMZmmSAStlknjeQ-1; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:56:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E77B51081; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virtlab701.virt.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com (virtlab701.virt.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com [10.19.152.228]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B501A7AB79; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:56:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643633782; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1JEWyhY+r0hOMjVtuXtN9Q22acIEvtKQ7yVWg2CH7iI=; b=KrHMoFOjGM4PDYg1hmJM/X38odpOz1IYgXieFXabIDRyI4hxWxqHwMx2UAVFe5UtzxNfV5 YpT+tUYh0cu5NbAeMZkliP/ljzGjOyYW1NMsGnDKlcvNdpVLW+ThMAE0pP4Hs2oiHQq9mf ix7+7CKvgDflJfNtLDaXkR1Ff1RIiv0= X-MC-Unique: wFQ6IsBbMZmmSAStlknjeQ-1 From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH] block.h: remove outdated comment Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:56:15 -0500 Message-Id: <20220131125615.74612-1-eesposit@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eesposit@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=eesposit@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.088, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito , Hanna Reitz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1643638307193100001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The comment "disk I/O throttling" doesn't make any sense at all any more. It was added in commit 0563e191516 to describe bdrv_io_limits_enable()/disable(), which were removed in commit 97148076, so the comment is just a forgotten leftover. Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 --- include/block/block.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h index 9d4050220b..e1713ee306 100644 --- a/include/block/block.h +++ b/include/block/block.h @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ typedef unsigned int BdrvChildRole; char *bdrv_perm_names(uint64_t perm); uint64_t bdrv_qapi_perm_to_blk_perm(BlockPermission qapi_perm); =20 -/* disk I/O throttling */ void bdrv_init(void); void bdrv_init_with_whitelist(void); bool bdrv_uses_whitelist(void); --=20 2.31.1