From nobody Mon Feb 9 09:33:32 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1636016359842613.0439749524324; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 01:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miYac-0004dx-UM for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 04:59:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miYY3-0007kk-JE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 04:56:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:59002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miYY0-0000mM-M3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 04:56:38 -0400 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-463-8SGv3w6rPHCWsNu06sTZmQ-1; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 04:56:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7364280DE02 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eperezma.remote.csb (unknown [10.39.192.53]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385F1100239F; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:56:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636016195; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=faceouvYMIlePb3IaWeZgS3xQXI2g1spCxHWzpgxocI=; b=iGa4bMzlz7TnxscafI6onJ/syA211G3HV3JI3K/Ee3R4N1tpzsCit2z64FCmdATO2gLyUy a3EC4X/WSjA6QsPdEbn7YqAM5qfsLIMa+/cAl8+zIChMwwiHEr75ilu9MvL8Lzl3JfYt05 H3K6J8ZFJ+7kX/qSyqMli0UPuHSP92s= X-MC-Unique: 8SGv3w6rPHCWsNu06sTZmQ-1 From: =?UTF-8?q?Eugenio=20P=C3=A9rez?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Fix last vq queue index of devices with no cvq Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:56:25 +0100 Message-Id: <20211104085625.2054959-3-eperezma@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20211104085625.2054959-1-eperezma@redhat.com> References: <20211104085625.2054959-1-eperezma@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eperezma@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=eperezma@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.717, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Juan Quintela Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1636016360593100001 The -1 assumes that cvq device model is accounted in data_queue_pairs, if cvq does not exists, but it's actually the opposite: Devices with !cvq are ok but devices with cvq does not add the last queue to data_queue_pairs. This is not a problem to vhost-net, but it is to vhost-vdpa: * Devices with cvq gets initialized at last data vq device model, not at cvq one. * Devices with !cvq never gets initialized, since last_index is the first queue of the last device model. Because of that, the right change in last_index is to actually add the cvq, not to remove the missing one. This is not a problem to vhost-net, but it is to vhost-vdpa, which device model trust to reach the last index to finish starting the device. Also, as the previous commit, rename it to index_end. Tested with vp_vdpa with host's vhost=3Don and vhost=3Doff, with ctrl_vq=3D= on and ctrl_vq=3Doff. Fixes: 049eb15b5fc9 ("vhost: record the last virtqueue index for the virtio= device") Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela Signed-off-by: Eugenio P=C3=A9rez Acked-by: Jason Wang --- hw/net/vhost_net.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c index 29f2c4212f..30379d2ca4 100644 --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c @@ -326,11 +326,11 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState= *ncs, VirtIONet *n =3D VIRTIO_NET(dev); int nvhosts =3D data_queue_pairs + cvq; struct vhost_net *net; - int r, e, i, last_index =3D data_queue_pairs * 2; + int r, e, i, index_end =3D data_queue_pairs * 2; NetClientState *peer; =20 - if (!cvq) { - last_index -=3D 1; + if (cvq) { + index_end +=3D 1; } =20 if (!k->set_guest_notifiers) { @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState *= ncs, } =20 net =3D get_vhost_net(peer); - vhost_net_set_vq_index(net, i * 2, last_index); + vhost_net_set_vq_index(net, i * 2, index_end); =20 /* Suppress the masking guest notifiers on vhost user * because vhost user doesn't interrupt masking/unmasking --=20 2.27.0