From nobody Mon Nov 17 12:06:34 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603796111; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=e1cilOCYG2bRBzcJx8nqzTw2kPdhM302yKBzosQrpjwuJCDZ7tkUJ96l6hL/MgozWDv955D6VS4ihl5PZu573nLzrLMgMCzGf/FlfQEIS8/xKn5yb8xJnr7PpzMl8Se+m1JbSzLI30X3H4/1/iNAZsdDnP6U/Dix3+3mPdFtq64= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1603796111; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To; bh=IOil/oTDsqd+1HxLwzb/9fVr3GE5auYbbyAGLLfSegw=; b=IEXARwnbZDl4h371rCB8NB9KlXI11P/3dGpbFyfNRBJBj+Bhd2hyaTxoIBky9XS7G9pJX5WZr9M3utAFCR0P1pIKMsoqsJYquSeLJQqR3crsC765XpPK5sJMVctxr6f1WwORJSWzM9UW5uBNNnU4+Q+fVYHp2sm6gh4sOHW+YCE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1603796111733777.300949262673; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXMdC-0002Nc-GR for importer@patchew.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:55:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXMXw-0008Oj-NJ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:49:44 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:47667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXMXs-000248-Cp; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:49:44 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547635C011A; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:49:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:49:37 -0400 Received: from apples.local (80-167-98-190-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net [80.167.98.190]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 177253280060; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:49:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=irrelevant.dk; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh= IOil/oTDsqd+1HxLwzb/9fVr3GE5auYbbyAGLLfSegw=; b=dhooJ5c/hpOk8JgX Q0KpTnZTU3OkKFLE9smGXH15X+saphXha6jVVzvHpTiopJQZyKzCHWXbSN2jHAuN o97yo6HLYaHgHli9GeXrKt2ffMXbIxKLwrDo5h45FC+XyCt3QCL7NMzrX5k0pJ+Z UTT32kc7osSXcaKW/UOO8NAorZ0GHMondbkY8io8WyPDWxVd7A7dwAdK8pB1/jZd 4hiS5W43reWDG99GTd2t1Pys8ShyI1FCWATkUi/5izhsrjTSOn/N6RZ62r893bUk QZtwnnCv7YN3rVTepWfNOWq62KML1N9fAxh0LK0hoDd6cOIe6Ffsw9S2SoTPmygw NX4Q/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=IOil/oTDsqd+1HxLwzb/9fVr3GE5auYbbyAGLLfSe gw=; b=Wf3/C6vBAJcRCBir56P/biL2Bv6M/LhLw45887wL4kiGXmonD5E4oKQ+S /OZ1HRhkLUgtjrw5zIQVeXMndENJdr+PgmuhXqG55D41fcIbPUSnhsiA3SyE6cLy rjpTzs2km1boZHxBLVjjSjepVA+ygF3elsqKTyecT6w/IbZMVPl/3kSENUm0k5t3 ifM0hRRp94uDh9e6uZ/qE/87slnzhfaVY4AVB8Liw8FGJyiB4C3k9RVtUU4SXyph 8DQkH2Tl9xZxw34P0d1QE4dLeK9xoqPVw7uGIV3evGMOo8aVtWPdohDeTBXTTNUV iMOEjtve7Axfft753X1vZrzbWeyyA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrkeelgddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhggtgfgsehtkeertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmlhgruhhs ucflvghnshgvnhcuoehithhssehirhhrvghlvghvrghnthdrughkqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeetveeuudegveeiheegieelueeftedvtdekteefleegheduhfejueelvdfhffdt geenucfkphepkedtrdduieejrdelkedrudeltdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehithhssehirhhrvghlvghvrghnthdrughk X-ME-Proxy: From: Klaus Jensen To: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 02/30] pci: pass along the return value of dma_memory_rw Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:49:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20201027104932.558087-3-its@irrelevant.dk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.1 In-Reply-To: <20201027104932.558087-1-its@irrelevant.dk> References: <20201027104932.558087-1-its@irrelevant.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=its@irrelevant.dk; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/27 06:49:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Klaus Jensen , Keith Busch , Klaus Jensen , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Klaus Jensen Some devices might want to know the return value of dma_memory_rw, so pass it along instead of ignoring it. There are no existing users of the return value, so this patch should be safe. Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Acked-by: Keith Busch --- include/hw/pci/pci.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h index 0a59a06b149d..f19ffe6b4fe8 100644 --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h @@ -783,8 +783,7 @@ static inline AddressSpace *pci_get_address_space(PCIDe= vice *dev) static inline int pci_dma_rw(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr, void *buf, dma_addr_t len, DMADirection dir) { - dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir); - return 0; + return dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir); } =20 static inline int pci_dma_read(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr, --=20 2.29.1