From nobody Mon Feb 9 20:46:08 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601462163; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=QORy2Lpv/0gMUiieN03vAhLW4i7l63pXGKnwH9P0zaU0a165VWHmksyyFW0uhLiovj5XQYVLVowbZoyc2VQVo6tgOD07I7QGTxi2tESE0MVx5YTwJNe9XKuKGcTcPDzUpd/Cqa9JcPIhKlExdWVsLGkHpCPN8zQIRMweyrF3GaM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1601462163; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To; bh=9Yxo/Z6y2b0Sf3ZlbKrmjFcD6TdCG6s60S8hfuEDpvw=; b=RhSC9DSY0n/d2hooXS8gsCCR0x6tdVw+IfI/sU43rVgDIIFr2HR9bxYcLOqiWlnZucKj4QM7GqeBq7uWYVcaYs9FJm5fJLpxdrKNr0J2uAWT4cppRo3vElbCxL2xutkfbtBV3Tf7ROKtpJqNnRWUBAjFjyXk9BGzqY2lLEK1tJw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1601462163165186.216638448185; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 03:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNZ1y-0006WS-Rv for importer@patchew.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:08:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYp1-0007sm-Lk; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:51 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:49976 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYon-0004QU-6k; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:51 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 96FD6E9574FEB3C54B7C; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.174.185.186) by DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:25 +0800 From: zhaolichang To: Subject: [PATCH RFC 14/14] target/: fix some comment spelling errors Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:53:21 +0800 Message-ID: <20200930095321.2006-15-zhaolichang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> References: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.174.185.186] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.35; envelope-from=zhaolichang@huawei.com; helo=huawei.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/30 05:46:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: zhaolichang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu/target. I used spellcheck to check the spelling errors and found some errors in the= folder. Signed-off-by: zhaolichang Reviewed-by: David Edmondson Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 --- target/openrisc/cpu.h | 2 +- target/sparc/asi.h | 2 +- target/unicore32/translate.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/openrisc/cpu.h b/target/openrisc/cpu.h index bd42faf..8ca8605 100644 --- a/target/openrisc/cpu.h +++ b/target/openrisc/cpu.h @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ typedef struct CPUOpenRISCState { int is_counting; =20 uint32_t picmr; /* Interrupt mask register */ - uint32_t picsr; /* Interrupt contrl register*/ + uint32_t picsr; /* Interrupt control register*/ #endif void *irq[32]; /* Interrupt irq input */ } CPUOpenRISCState; diff --git a/target/sparc/asi.h b/target/sparc/asi.h index bb58735..4e9f1d5 100644 --- a/target/sparc/asi.h +++ b/target/sparc/asi.h @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ #define ASI_INTR_ID 0x63 /* (CMT) Interrupt ID register */ #define ASI_CORE_ID 0x63 /* (CMT) LP ID register */ #define ASI_CESR_ID 0x63 /* (CMT) CESR ID register */ -#define ASI_IC_INSTR 0x66 /* Insn cache instrucion ram diag */ +#define ASI_IC_INSTR 0x66 /* Insn cache instruction ram diag */ #define ASI_IC_TAG 0x67 /* Insn cache tag/valid ram diag */ #define ASI_IC_STAG 0x68 /* (III) Insn cache snoop tag ram */ #define ASI_IC_PRE_DECODE 0x6e /* Insn cache pre-decode ram diag */ diff --git a/target/unicore32/translate.c b/target/unicore32/translate.c index d4b06df..2e91b05 100644 --- a/target/unicore32/translate.c +++ b/target/unicore32/translate.c @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void load_reg_var(DisasContext *s, TCGv var, int= reg) { if (reg =3D=3D 31) { uint32_t addr; - /* normaly, since we updated PC */ + /* normally, since we updated PC */ addr =3D (long)s->pc; tcg_gen_movi_i32(var, addr); } else { --=20 2.26.2.windows.1