From nobody Mon Feb 9 20:46:05 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601463533; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=MA6BxfQHMwovgIZqL/acBl7yExsIrXdtQDuVGbHSdwCfUWdDHBda7YOFzHvNF7wGTJFOIpUDImhSotdVmHwAf6N2PIZheVSWld+/krjneIAW1EX0XtYoqV3Iqp1epkjp/oiGFYHGYdncHbf+ee2WftDq+W5nCMIFM9IAmDCfruw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1601463533; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To; bh=lQ54i8xcbvbPAXrKpT6RyyJUVU19DP58dBYbF+2ugco=; b=PmmaVhkDX9cg4ACgl+bUvpjxw+Gydp9Wt2/ghJpfFvgQXjzsfwhRqgFvVVq946ElxFw26kWvgjXEJvIRsztWcVaqHPocJ1tGzvfyb15WPTP6D0I140lLaHP02PJbcg7yjJaBuQU136ulbr5CNGklVzZ8pvwAU3F4zFaLMqgjO/8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1601463533271883.458660323281; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 03:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45520 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNZ0R-0004f9-Eb for importer@patchew.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:06:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYp1-0007s7-Ec; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:51 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:49942 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYol-0004QJ-06; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:51 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 78E83DA85810A5CBFB69; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.174.185.186) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:23 +0800 From: zhaolichang To: Subject: [PATCH RFC 13/14] alpha/: fix some comment spelling errors Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:53:20 +0800 Message-ID: <20200930095321.2006-14-zhaolichang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> References: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.174.185.186] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.35; envelope-from=zhaolichang@huawei.com; helo=huawei.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/30 05:46:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: zhaolichang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu/target/= alpha. I used spellcheck to check the spelling errors and found some errors in the= folder. Signed-off-by: zhaolichang Reviewed-by: David Edmondson Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 --- target/alpha/cpu.h | 4 ++-- target/alpha/translate.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/alpha/cpu.h b/target/alpha/cpu.h index be29bdd..8a6d477 100644 --- a/target/alpha/cpu.h +++ b/target/alpha/cpu.h @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ enum { =20 That said, we're only emulating Unix PALcode, and not attempting VMS, so we don't need to implement Executive and Supervisor. QEMU's own - PALcode cheats and usees the KSEG mapping for its code+data rather than + PALcode cheats and uses the KSEG mapping for its code+data rather than physical addresses. */ =20 #define MMU_KERNEL_IDX 0 @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ enum { The Unix PALcode only uses bit 4. */ #define PS_USER_MODE 8u =20 -/* CPUAlphaState->flags constants. These are layed out so that we +/* CPUAlphaState->flags constants. These are laid out so that we can set or reset the pieces individually by assigning to the byte, or manipulated as a whole. */ =20 diff --git a/target/alpha/translate.c b/target/alpha/translate.c index 8870284..6aef9ec 100644 --- a/target/alpha/translate.c +++ b/target/alpha/translate.c @@ -2939,7 +2939,7 @@ static void alpha_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextB= ase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu) the first fp insn of the TB. Alternately we could define a proper default for every TB (e.g. QUAL_RM_N or QUAL_RM_D) and make sure to reset the FP_STATUS to that default at the end of any TB that - changes the default. We could even (gasp) dynamiclly figure out + changes the default. We could even (gasp) dynamically figure out what default would be most efficient given the running program. */ ctx->tb_rm =3D -1; /* Similarly for flush-to-zero. */ --=20 2.26.2.windows.1