From nobody Mon Feb 9 20:46:06 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601463619; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=nWaAI15J3C7LXM4nQKXBYK/ZkUNxzJFkBjEkEwSZDHUqo6XsXUG09gTz/OpisCIRrOAfymhiFXJCCOlYZ9jbyPw1holW2fyP/0z2r6Uh9xK5bIhpr6hKUQHSm26kacrbCoOm456/BYR4TgBS/KoYk8fVsySqpdRNf4r52Ier9aQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1601463619; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To; bh=FN1AhDTCmUfCEpLr6aaqs2t8qSLK3ktqHZ93X3x7UTk=; b=UVXjdGn3SChSVc0jr2+mB2nlJOzxuU+QCPfMLWWbCR9sVD/iJ+EElT/ky/AwYbA3wsXEBfHouzwT1rRzFwzmy9Hc3SExGqiUJtp6NRpHh/A+vn/k/Cw1ERbdUcELgy22Bb6slmYryQKQXAKqzz9XVd/3Aa7HCZExVAv92uskiPw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1601463619122249.1103565083065; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 04:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45134 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNZ0A-0004Vj-LW for importer@patchew.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:06:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYot-0007le-Sz; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:43 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:46890 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYoh-0004Pr-E9; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:43 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0378641AB2E9DBD4BE95; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.174.185.186) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:21 +0800 From: zhaolichang To: Subject: [PATCH RFC 11/14] avr/: fix some comment spelling errors Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:53:18 +0800 Message-ID: <20200930095321.2006-12-zhaolichang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> References: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.174.185.186] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.32; envelope-from=zhaolichang@huawei.com; helo=huawei.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/30 05:46:49 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: zhaolichang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu/target/= avr. I used spellcheck to check the spelling errors and found some errors in the= folder. Signed-off-by: zhaolichang Reviewed-by: David Edmondson Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 --- target/avr/helper.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/avr/helper.c b/target/avr/helper.c index d96d143..9f325bc 100644 --- a/target/avr/helper.c +++ b/target/avr/helper.c @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int avr_cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cs, vaddr addr, uin= t8_t *buf, =20 hwaddr avr_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUState *cs, vaddr addr) { - return addr; /* I assume 1:1 address correspondance */ + return addr; /* I assume 1:1 address correspondence */ } =20 bool avr_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int size, @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void helper_outb(CPUAVRState *env, uint32_t port, uint3= 2_t data) } =20 /* - * this function implements LD instruction when there is a posibility to = read + * this function implements LD instruction when there is a possibility to= read * from a CPU register */ target_ulong helper_fullrd(CPUAVRState *env, uint32_t addr) @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ target_ulong helper_fullrd(CPUAVRState *env, uint32_t a= ddr) } =20 /* - * this function implements ST instruction when there is a posibility to = write + * this function implements ST instruction when there is a possibility to= write * into a CPU register */ void helper_fullwr(CPUAVRState *env, uint32_t data, uint32_t addr) --=20 2.26.2.windows.1