From nobody Mon Feb 9 20:32:47 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1578373674; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=U95OdFCZdE4VGl1YR8QSQrP9ozZOUzFBjzn1g4ZvMCQDT60cR1s/padVaFBl+meQA1z7dQKKCbNwoRpstX/eDDKVuvyeiu8N9yDIeEqs5e3XTbLc7rq/ijL5uoZ7aOn8yw4lWQY6LMjANskiyYuoCpOQBH4Xj6BdOCeph0bZsRI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1578373674; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To; bh=ESxeKF3PCrJHi4jca7zaF24WA0aIS+LNCL1dm6PXEs8=; b=OgFCU5nNPTZEN5D0UkEHVMQ/IGjpKK99PZIeeJdQ5ff4F6o8AdwbRBwCCbnff8J/OEso58kfHrjvrNfjfzWYAqRwpiLg5OHOYgVk1M2Oc2MO5EO6ongssM71t78sFhZom88TSR7/zQ10ztNVHo1ZrKWTMOssaf0gs4mFKZA20mc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1578373674011372.95555082291264; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 21:07:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioh5r-0004KQ-I4 for importer@patchew.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:07:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iognO-0005PY-Oa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:48:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iognM-0004iE-Uj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:48:46 -0500 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:42311 helo=ozlabs.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iognM-0004d1-J6; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:48:44 -0500 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 47sKdY0JTvz9sSH; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:48:32 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gibson.dropbear.id.au; s=201602; t=1578372513; bh=Rxx2qkydXpS+SLgpGEY+gkMtWzxEvGQpLzM+4rL4q54=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KSgeKko3TEPuy6VlolqIa9oT06CfVwwoIZwxgO3QkzcqXxkuWIKw5n2FkIen/PIce 58cd/Zll3iAwfMLZEHgzpVs/pIDPOvHiC+iLouYAUzIhg60fdenlHRyskS7BJb6EYQ LkvDuALOTe48leeJUiAXIdT7o9R/VHPZ3bZOiVK0= From: David Gibson To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, groug@kaod.org, philmd@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS] Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:48:25 +1100 Message-Id: <20200107044827.471355-9-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200107044827.471355-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> References: <20200107044827.471355-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 203.11.71.1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, paulus@samba.org, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Currently we use a big switch statement in ppc_hash64_update_rmls() to work out what the right RMA limit is based on the LPCR[RMLS] field. There's no formula for this - it's just an arbitrary mapping defined by the existing CPU implementations - but we can make it a bit more readable by using a lookup table rather than a switch. In addition we can use the MiB/GiB symbols to make it a bit clearer. While there we add a bit of clarity and rationale to the comment about what happens if the LPCR[RMLS] doesn't contain a valid value. Signed-off-by: David Gibson Reviewed-by: C=C3=A9dric Le Goater --- target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c index 127b7250ae..bb9ebeaf48 100644 --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ * License along with this library; if not, see . */ #include "qemu/osdep.h" +#include "qemu/units.h" #include "cpu.h" #include "exec/exec-all.h" #include "exec/helper-proto.h" @@ -755,6 +756,39 @@ static void ppc_hash64_set_c(PowerPCCPU *cpu, hwaddr p= tex, uint64_t pte1) stb_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, base + offset, (pte1 & 0xff) | 0x80); } =20 +static target_ulong rmls_limit(PowerPCCPU *cpu) +{ + CPUPPCState *env =3D &cpu->env; + /* + * This is the full 4 bits encoding of POWER8. Previous + * CPUs only support a subset of these but the filtering + * is done when writing LPCR + */ + const target_ulong rma_sizes[] =3D { + [0] =3D 0, + [1] =3D 16 * GiB, + [2] =3D 1 * GiB, + [3] =3D 64 * MiB, + [4] =3D 256 * MiB, + [5] =3D 0, + [6] =3D 0, + [7] =3D 128 * MiB, + [8] =3D 32 * MiB, + }; + target_ulong rmls =3D (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_RMLS) >> LPCR_RMLS_SH= IFT; + + if (rmls < ARRAY_SIZE(rma_sizes)) { + return rma_sizes[rmls]; + } else { + /* + * Bad value, so the OS has shot itself in the foot. Return a + * 0-sized RMA which we expect to trigger an immediate DSI or + * ISI + */ + return 0; + } +} + int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr, int rwx, int mmu_idx) { @@ -1004,41 +1038,6 @@ void ppc_hash64_tlb_flush_hpte(PowerPCCPU *cpu, targ= et_ulong ptex, cpu->env.tlb_need_flush =3D TLB_NEED_GLOBAL_FLUSH | TLB_NEED_LOCAL_FLU= SH; } =20 -static void ppc_hash64_update_rmls(PowerPCCPU *cpu) -{ - CPUPPCState *env =3D &cpu->env; - uint64_t lpcr =3D env->spr[SPR_LPCR]; - - /* - * This is the full 4 bits encoding of POWER8. Previous - * CPUs only support a subset of these but the filtering - * is done when writing LPCR - */ - switch ((lpcr & LPCR_RMLS) >> LPCR_RMLS_SHIFT) { - case 0x8: /* 32MB */ - env->rmls =3D 0x2000000ull; - break; - case 0x3: /* 64MB */ - env->rmls =3D 0x4000000ull; - break; - case 0x7: /* 128MB */ - env->rmls =3D 0x8000000ull; - break; - case 0x4: /* 256MB */ - env->rmls =3D 0x10000000ull; - break; - case 0x2: /* 1GB */ - env->rmls =3D 0x40000000ull; - break; - case 0x1: /* 16GB */ - env->rmls =3D 0x400000000ull; - break; - default: - /* What to do here ??? */ - env->rmls =3D 0; - } -} - static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu) { CPUPPCState *env =3D &cpu->env; @@ -1097,7 +1096,7 @@ void ppc_store_lpcr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong val) CPUPPCState *env =3D &cpu->env; =20 env->spr[SPR_LPCR] =3D val & pcc->lpcr_mask; - ppc_hash64_update_rmls(cpu); + env->rmls =3D rmls_limit(cpu); ppc_hash64_update_vrma(cpu); } =20 --=20 2.24.1