From nobody Wed Nov 12 11:54:54 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570182033; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=nwWwRuspunalRvTGwXcSwG53H6OROEvQTTJaFuCkxPgF8u+dDev1wOO4JOiDudOf0Q/JWuwwLXgfKstPk9nlqLxteZWXNuENI2Ga0e1u8XwKcfG2JlxuwYmlFgSgDjcNoiHSYz+hGogw36P0yHqM2Y9GkOEpXbDeKxVM5wPg4LM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1570182033; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=SC+XtiugHrIpjCKK6PqCnV2hP0be73rvnKsNoqnUPMo=; b=dmQcLOfSGLJT2EyovWWNHflRsAcoLDIfopvhgb1VWndO5vKz0PRgRBcdAsH7IIHVz4qTWbAoWQLY4q8VZLp9eesjA4VWZ0b+dGaLC/Pj/qHgWlXHJIKLDNO9gjN24rVFfj66477wNbQNipeLAhE//neyRDnfY4Vpm+3EQmFddHI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (209.51.188.17 [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1570182033796468.40956466537796; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 02:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43772 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iGK4X-00073U-5L for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:40:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52205) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iGK2C-0004oy-De for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:38:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iGK2B-0004z8-8m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:38:00 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:43637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iGK2A-0004ve-Dv; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:37:59 -0400 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 46l4YF5Vzbz9sQp; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:37:53 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gibson.dropbear.id.au; s=201602; t=1570181873; bh=OPluXa4qYRAYPp0b/0a7pI97i+PJYoa+vQAbavFSld0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R8U9ndwcLaLmhS603Qa/i24ZYJlJCuH7FcdCdSGD2s2cf4x9astmsDD8gkN+TIaAQ EY5heANKbc+Y3Sr7FSQS9sYO77bGcSGGIFX/AadPh+t3PCbQD2LPhIXeKkBkOaDtZQ FiEBAP3CCvDFhgi6sC/Ny+kFqoWCnWVH356uA2d8= From: David Gibson To: peter.maydell@linaro.org Subject: [PULL 05/53] spapr: Report kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() in 'info pic' Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:36:59 +1000 Message-Id: <20191004093747.31350-6-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20191004093747.31350-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> References: <20191004093747.31350-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 203.11.71.1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, groug@kaod.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Greg Kurz Unless the machine was started with kernel-irqchip=3Don, we cannot easily tell if we're actually using an in-kernel or an emulated irqchip. This information is important enough that it is worth printing it in 'info pic'. Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz Message-Id: <156829860985.2073005.5893493824873412773.stgit@bahia.tls.ibm.c= om> Reviewed-by: C=C3=A9dric Le Goater Signed-off-by: David Gibson --- hw/ppc/spapr.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c index f976d76eca..2725b139a7 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ #include "hw/mem/memory-device.h" #include "hw/ppc/spapr_tpm_proxy.h" =20 +#include "monitor/monitor.h" + #include =20 /* SLOF memory layout: @@ -4354,6 +4356,8 @@ static void spapr_pic_print_info(InterruptStatsProvid= er *obj, SpaprMachineState *spapr =3D SPAPR_MACHINE(obj); =20 spapr->irq->print_info(spapr, mon); + monitor_printf(mon, "irqchip: %s\n", + kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() ? "in-kernel" : "emulated"); } =20 int spapr_get_vcpu_id(PowerPCCPU *cpu) --=20 2.21.0