From nobody Wed Nov 12 11:55:37 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570185158; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=AHNvk9RA744cTWQCM6tMliby4FZtNDCQR+pLTt3J+q5+XDDh+xb9/PUmAZBVelZfE34xd2B02bXrzzC9eEv2FOdEjMLMEg1ZXmRVrQxwjPGNAzTK0qUqjpA8vKiTdHtpEXavBkMA88PieBMpdycxxJJkb2SPJkt3GjrQjGY5t3s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1570185158; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=saVLmzS+j94bLlRcg+l0ZAJrmXhJYRwj2scXFIzs0nQ=; b=ihlA7Bas99lNvNh3KYJpiarBjO9C91Sm+6evDhrVcdcRXHkEvXYYfwkg82WX8spsklZCuHMKgFbiMUhJO3r8Yo7pBD7tktvrSykN1sEpv93G33IQ/NB5nH1N6+FT+gK+vBwwm8mzFn1RYf85jIXUv+qJnvi9PgMXX4AQ6u+S9EA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1570185156993736.0792556588382; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 03:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iGKsv-0003b3-Ve for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 06:32:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iGK3W-0006JD-5Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:39:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iGK3U-0006MK-IJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:39:21 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:35545 helo=ozlabs.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iGK3U-00063r-6E; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 05:39:20 -0400 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 46l4YS3G24z9sSZ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:38:04 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gibson.dropbear.id.au; s=201602; t=1570181884; bh=Wye/qEPS8JlbxvZNXB3cl6mwul/+AF68CA7+4TAPj1c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TVtoOoL4FJA4TaOWxrXr5G/+UE4TxJ1/O0Z4mC7egQNMdH3GLZXEsG0RxJSlNBaQj 3Vy/ne2Bl0Gd1+2jnZ+F+7byk6PQ1+rMwGWlzWmS3Ys0V3aAaMkVpwW+QbPubpcBzq p3IN59Laliob/T4dBSBm6qAmDtLQlMqPmiXhlHwM= From: David Gibson To: peter.maydell@linaro.org Subject: [PULL 48/53] spapr, xics, xive: Better use of assert()s on irq claim/free paths Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:37:42 +1000 Message-Id: <20191004093747.31350-49-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20191004093747.31350-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> References: <20191004093747.31350-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 203.11.71.1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, groug@kaod.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The irq claim and free paths for both XICS and XIVE check for some validity conditions. Some of these represent genuine runtime failures, however others - particularly checking that the basic irq number is in a sane range - could only fail in the case of bugs in the callin code. Therefore use assert()s instead of runtime failures for those. In addition the non backend-specific part of the claim/free paths should only be used for PAPR external irqs, that is in the range SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE to the maximum irq number. Put assert()s for that into the top level dispatchers as well. Signed-off-by: David Gibson Reviewed-by: C=C3=A9dric Le Goater Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz --- hw/intc/spapr_xive.c | 8 ++------ hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c index c1c97192a7..47b5ec0b56 100644 --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c @@ -532,9 +532,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lis= n, bool lsi) { XiveSource *xsrc =3D &xive->source; =20 - if (lisn >=3D xive->nr_irqs) { - return false; - } + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); =20 /* * Set default values when allocating an IRQ number @@ -559,9 +557,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lis= n, bool lsi) =20 bool spapr_xive_irq_free(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn) { - if (lisn >=3D xive->nr_irqs) { - return false; - } + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); =20 xive->eat[lisn].w &=3D cpu_to_be64(~EAS_VALID); return true; diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c index d2ac35bbe1..025c802e7b 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c @@ -118,11 +118,7 @@ static int spapr_irq_claim_xics(SpaprMachineState *spa= pr, int irq, bool lsi, ICSState *ics =3D spapr->ics; =20 assert(ics); - - if (!ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { - error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is invalid", irq); - return -1; - } + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); =20 if (!ics_irq_free(ics, irq - ics->offset)) { error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is not free", irq); @@ -138,9 +134,9 @@ static void spapr_irq_free_xics(SpaprMachineState *spap= r, int irq) ICSState *ics =3D spapr->ics; uint32_t srcno =3D irq - ics->offset; =20 - if (ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { - memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); - } + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); + + memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); } =20 static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Monitor *m= on) @@ -623,6 +619,9 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **e= rrp) =20 int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **e= rrp) { + assert(irq >=3D SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); + assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); + return spapr->irq->claim(spapr, irq, lsi, errp); } =20 @@ -630,6 +629,9 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, = int num) { int i; =20 + assert(irq >=3D SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); + assert((irq + num) <=3D (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); + for (i =3D irq; i < (irq + num); i++) { spapr->irq->free(spapr, i); } --=20 2.21.0