From nobody Mon Feb 9 10:58:05 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564749040; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=OQ+AEe0vi5pkbB/wD0TnzSSljbn0BNJqlHMzCGeA1LvT3/FFztfz7nbWDYv0y84CtDLgR4SsfrD7Ps5kG/E32HxNEaUP10WQQTAyLbTmENSoM4IkKDUbiEQOQFceh6UtLLuuL8l2oDFPl30Su95YvywVJgGzq4ZCar1tujiLmEA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1564749040; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=LOeqTBwv18ys1R4WJY6DhTn/HjPYYm9iVtV8hizue6A=; b=StQxxC5UYNCfbHQjcs4DK2ovWN/2uaKrP1aWQxliOlZtQULrwdip9fHS+16H0Xnv2nwzRGcQfjD5h535bxAlcHL6Z3B1SmJZv+x079Lr+Nlx2VJwaoPb9Ks1Qtqmp+wVFQ89yWi7RFD5AaZEGcusg8AT8IqnzTcDEeZ6yCetTho= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail header.from= (p=none dis=none) header.from= Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1564749040771354.5385770017698; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 05:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34454 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htWhj-0005oD-Oc for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:30:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htWdo-0005WC-MF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:26:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htWdn-0001zn-Mh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:26:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htWdk-0001uz-IT; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:26:33 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4AE300BC74; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kamzik.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.160]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528B85C205; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 12:26:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrew Jones To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:25:34 +0200 Message-Id: <20190802122540.26385-10-drjones@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190802122540.26385-1-drjones@redhat.com> References: <20190802122540.26385-1-drjones@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.45]); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/15] target/arm/kvm64: Fix error returns X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, armbru@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A couple return -EINVAL's forgot their '-'s. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Eric Auger Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- target/arm/kvm64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c index 3d91846beb8f..ddde6268b9d0 100644 --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level) write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true); =20 if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) { - return EINVAL; + return -EINVAL; } =20 kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu); @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) } =20 if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) { - return EINVAL; + return -EINVAL; } /* Note that it's OK to have registers which aren't in CPUState, * so we can ignore a failure return here. --=20 2.20.1