From nobody Sat Feb 7 06:35:21 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564486018; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=fLYYyAstHA9JLigwmvBEkIC4xPg3sJfkwcFmWrWd5AwIL7I3Z1M7B5aBxNQkSmQm+WF//4Y/D9KWE/7JDssxzLY2qbab93FlEbNRKWE9m3VseJBRFQu8uhmKdjszYt4/QLqqpGI1BgmcKtrvBAYbjrp3bpxYB8mvv0OzEOSz2AQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1564486018; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=PJN1l1Mb09O/ObF15qRz5EzxDV2bXi1isiHp5WRCSeY=; b=jTqV5gQQoiBgce2Afp5MPA76fIU7rPtTl7JArtaJ5mrfEjojtZOMFoFb+1/ajdc6ILVQX8U9ttxrfahrRVZTdFLLTZEpJpzD2jYZTHwn2fRNOs9bX5dQEjUJ389twH7uQOyLrp9jiLhaeAy7a5qF4B9zZj00biFa+wj+P8v5jgM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail header.from= (p=none dis=none) header.from= Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1564486018705327.2856753967659; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 04:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQHP-0007RA-Nl for importer@patchew.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:26:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQFJ-0003ak-Ct for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:24:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQFH-0006ji-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:24:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsQFB-0006et-8O; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:24:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26886300BEA8; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (ovpn-117-75.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.75]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA5060623; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:24:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Wolf To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:24:25 +0200 Message-Id: <20190730112425.21497-5-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190730112425.21497-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20190730112425.21497-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 4/4] scsi-cd: Fix inserting read-only media in empty drive X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" scsi-disks decides whether it has a read-only device by looking at whether the BlockBackend specified as drive=3D... is read-only. In the case of an anonymous BlockBackend (with a node name specified in drive=3D...), this is the read-only flag of the attached node. In the case of an empty anonymous BlockBackend, it's always read-write because nothing prevented it from being read-write. This is a problem because scsi-cd would take write permissions on the anonymous BlockBackend of an empty drive created without a drive=3D... option. Using blockdev-insert-medium with a read-only node fails then with the error message "Block node is read-only". Fix scsi_realize() so that scsi-cd devices always take read-only permissions on their BlockBackend instead. Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1733920 Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 Reviewed-by: Max Reitz Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster --- hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c index 8e95e3e38d..af3e622dc5 100644 --- a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c +++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c @@ -2318,6 +2318,7 @@ static void scsi_disk_unit_attention_reported(SCSIDev= ice *dev) static void scsi_realize(SCSIDevice *dev, Error **errp) { SCSIDiskState *s =3D DO_UPCAST(SCSIDiskState, qdev, dev); + bool read_only; =20 if (!s->qdev.conf.blk) { error_setg(errp, "drive property not set"); @@ -2351,8 +2352,13 @@ static void scsi_realize(SCSIDevice *dev, Error **er= rp) return; } } - if (!blkconf_apply_backend_options(&dev->conf, - blk_is_read_only(s->qdev.conf.blk), + + read_only =3D blk_is_read_only(s->qdev.conf.blk); + if (dev->type =3D=3D TYPE_ROM) { + read_only =3D true; + } + + if (!blkconf_apply_backend_options(&dev->conf, read_only, dev->type =3D=3D TYPE_DISK, errp)) { return; } --=20 2.20.1