From nobody Mon Feb 9 01:19:40 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564054648; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=nTUAralhxkrLwfUTzdsoWDqysce1rCR7xJzom0sMF2mhe0bCm1d2Zf92BHKmzVWl2ROiIm8mKCm2b5RFgO2IVEfwFEQPK0Cr9GCccOtmKASh8jJseVUpNSbK930N3djc0kKIJFIF4fOZ3mpvbTbcfbgjxkl64AnyZbAiOR7JKis= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1564054648; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=mLFfpR6/Vh5HnF04Ih0I2TBvR0Mpvsh8/F+VAm8AXtA=; b=SnrWW7gMqI+IiUUAlsDSXe1uOss6M++GLw2nXsbl8o5rYyfIcMuJhLRobaa9PIm0+6wjHlZJYkd8M63RLw72UH1Gj05fK9Q7kT6676hV4qLOAxhhYxBNtbBAWZvcYEy6oSOsAqgJ2i5CFNNKvpV4YkpXixLiXi5bklYlYLqdIr4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail header.from= (p=none dis=none) header.from= Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1564054648621370.338835122564; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 04:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqc3r-000372-1Y for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:37:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqc3O-0001Sq-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:36:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqc3M-00038K-9B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:36:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqc3K-000379-Au; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:36:56 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 195E83092641; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t460s.redhat.com (ovpn-117-70.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928DD5437A; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:36:51 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:36:34 +0200 Message-Id: <20190725113638.4702-4-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190725113638.4702-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20190725113638.4702-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1 v4 3/7] virtio-balloon: Simplify deflate with pbp X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" , David Hildenbrand , qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Igor Mammedov , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Let's simplify this - the case we are optimizing for is very hard to trigger and not worth the effort. If we're switching from inflation to deflation, let's reset the pbp. Acked-by: David Gibson Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c | 26 +++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c index a78d2d2184..04a7e6c772 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void balloon_deflate_page(VirtIOBalloon *balloon, void *addr =3D memory_region_get_ram_ptr(mr) + offset; RAMBlock *rb; size_t rb_page_size; - ram_addr_t ram_offset, host_page_base; + ram_addr_t ram_offset; void *host_addr; int ret; =20 @@ -125,27 +125,11 @@ static void balloon_deflate_page(VirtIOBalloon *ballo= on, * host address? */ rb =3D qemu_ram_block_from_host(addr, false, &ram_offset); rb_page_size =3D qemu_ram_pagesize(rb); - host_page_base =3D ram_offset & ~(rb_page_size - 1); - - if (balloon->pbp - && rb =3D=3D balloon->pbp->rb - && host_page_base =3D=3D balloon->pbp->base) { - int subpages =3D rb_page_size / BALLOON_PAGE_SIZE; =20 - /* - * This means the guest has asked to discard some of the 4kiB - * subpages of a host page, but then changed its mind and - * asked to keep them after all. It's exceedingly unlikely - * for a guest to do this in practice, but handle it anyway, - * since getting it wrong could mean discarding memory the - * guest is still using. */ - clear_bit((ram_offset - balloon->pbp->base) / BALLOON_PAGE_SIZE, - balloon->pbp->bitmap); - - if (bitmap_empty(balloon->pbp->bitmap, subpages)) { - g_free(balloon->pbp); - balloon->pbp =3D NULL; - } + if (balloon->pbp) { + /* Let's play safe and always reset the pbp on deflation requests.= */ + g_free(balloon->pbp); + balloon->pbp =3D NULL; } =20 host_addr =3D (void *)((uintptr_t)addr & ~(rb_page_size - 1)); --=20 2.21.0