From nobody Mon Feb 9 14:33:52 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561135645; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=iHxzhIE0bjm10n3EVZBh/0rdAco3H++/+xT/Em+wY08BJ20eC6QyOuzsypIfb72Fa6B8eM6DGZCLhkPeg3Hl2KQlT2XDv9coAfyquXi0qsYqhr2ZhHZtKX+OyYKOqJnsXCbnNwOVlWjWL44wCvpKBWMfhRLS3dueGTMGmDesyXc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1561135645; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=d8XhzKfC3CqnNEjQ1nB7+IrQlGggqFPqVFAKHjoP2ak=; b=TqLLKUXvpFztZsp96XP2YSO+pgZ60+JIzwnDtffK3WCxJTFFBrv1klfKuh/2Z/EJux3fF2t6jr+x3T5MXKIrTpGV0Uq4it1szt37mcVt84q+WnaJOPeLsUkYmxiudA5TR8VcCx1uoY/ZaYSc6cFcBABWLKFxvCuk2F5hZjW4Ci8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail header.from= (p=none dis=none) header.from= Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1561135645100203.62259879380906; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heMh6-00035g-R9 for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:47:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heMVW-0001qN-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heMVS-0001sn-JE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heMVM-0001Vl-4L; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0E585540; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kamzik.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.160]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7755E1001DE1; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:35:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrew Jones To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:34:16 +0200 Message-Id: <20190621163422.6127-9-drjones@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190621163422.6127-1-drjones@redhat.com> References: <20190621163422.6127-1-drjones@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/14] target/arm/kvm64: Fix error returns X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, armbru@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A couple return -EINVAL's forgot their '-'s. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Eric Auger Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- target/arm/kvm64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c index 45ccda589903..9ca9a0ce821d 100644 --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level) write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true); =20 if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) { - return EINVAL; + return -EINVAL; } =20 kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu); @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) } =20 if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) { - return EINVAL; + return -EINVAL; } /* Note that it's OK to have registers which aren't in CPUState, * so we can ignore a failure return here. --=20 2.20.1