From nobody Wed Dec 17 05:42:08 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559574556; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=GEjYXxKHebC22s0Pa5fOn+zTOU/FTRdKN+cAYMyoxgT6Aj0+9E5rUw3WZ6ylZId5eXuci2YJsRXRZbE4hVEsqSr6WGe50Bg6BMaW1qAv2e0sfp4c1BZw5bnXLqsvO9b5o244ii/d42R7Ke5H4z0Su5qdWDtTpMzYkda9VlqtyTw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1559574556; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=nsL4oQLsEO+QF5jSxGhOh7amPODT9TzM28kxiZTE8do=; b=j0/7OTdBy824d1TMo5Y8uB0/7hWykwwxc1YmNuDlMYKAZRHlvee7OGSIDF7C7tuvMCLeuCxfX4A+ByNCnOZT/REEukRC07QNu9taXOPulUDH+3LZq9+0E3om9ZKynCKZQZy7LZ12SyYLIG5DnGqoXneE+XoMs5dZqF0SI1YttO4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail header.from= (p=none dis=none) header.from= Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (209.51.188.17 [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1559574556020738.9136539031236; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXoZj-00042v-Fg for importer@patchew.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:08:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXoUV-0000KM-4N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:03:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXoUT-0006nU-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:03:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXoUQ-0006UP-Eq; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:03:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD063107B20; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from linux.fritz.box.com (ovpn-116-129.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.129]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CC961B6A; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:02:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Wolf To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 17:02:06 +0200 Message-Id: <20190603150233.6614-2-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190603150233.6614-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20190603150233.6614-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.47]); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 15:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 01/28] block: Drain source node in bdrv_replace_node() X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Instead of just asserting that no requests are in flight in bdrv_replace_node(), which is a requirement that most callers ignore, we can just drain the source node right there. This fixes at least starting a commit job while I/O is active on the backing chain, but probably other callers, too. Having requests in flight on the target node isn't a problem because the target just gets new parents, but the call path of running requests isn't modified. So we can just drop this assertion without a replacement. Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1711643 Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf Reviewed-by: Max Reitz --- block.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/block.c b/block.c index 1a73e310c1..4c3902508d 100644 --- a/block.c +++ b/block.c @@ -4017,13 +4017,13 @@ void bdrv_replace_node(BlockDriverState *from, Bloc= kDriverState *to, uint64_t perm =3D 0, shared =3D BLK_PERM_ALL; int ret; =20 - assert(!atomic_read(&from->in_flight)); - assert(!atomic_read(&to->in_flight)); - /* Make sure that @from doesn't go away until we have successfully att= ached * all of its parents to @to. */ bdrv_ref(from); =20 + assert(qemu_get_current_aio_context() =3D=3D qemu_get_aio_context()); + bdrv_drained_begin(from); + /* Put all parents into @list and calculate their cumulative permissio= ns */ QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(c, &from->parents, next_parent, next) { assert(c->bs =3D=3D from); @@ -4064,6 +4064,7 @@ void bdrv_replace_node(BlockDriverState *from, BlockD= riverState *to, =20 out: g_slist_free(list); + bdrv_drained_end(from); bdrv_unref(from); } =20 --=20 2.20.1