From nobody Wed Dec 17 21:46:26 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1557493559; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=ofhrih+erPLeYsA+OEpF4p11eDF7u5jgIClBgztzAX2bFblRt+cnkdjUL6FwTiUcDI/Fm0D71yBxPqf+ciXcNsIaOQxiP/b8//LmeqFVccO8gNzr3tU5omP8t/TQ1Le2l7YNyOGHvXxZFUb8DILTO07n0nO0XV9In0O6XrHexEk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1557493559; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=6hWYep/+n1KhITPESHqAi1e+wx/HWJ2WBH26yo/N5oo=; b=j47CmlAx4Skm0WsXFNM9FxK7ujpKKAGSQuYkKBWSKu5OfNgilJ5M4VtDc0PHgyZxu025qC/yICZjRFCJl7/BxIwsicFbKOn5in74x+akjvp/H/GwISY+X0WhBaWi42JAYuCkHIJyGvKBKXqc3rK2NdEzoQgxpG3ult4hsClqgwo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail header.from= (p=none dis=none) header.from= Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1557493559370650.9307088989176; Fri, 10 May 2019 06:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42993 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP5Do-00069M-Cn for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 09:05:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP5B0-0004PF-T2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 09:03:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP5B0-0004Nu-0x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 09:03:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP5Ay-0004In-0A; Fri, 10 May 2019 09:03:00 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CA2C3086211; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-89.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.89]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9380E60126; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:02:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:02:39 +0100 Message-Id: <20190510130243.8887-5-stefanha@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190510130243.8887-1-stefanha@redhat.com> References: <20190510130243.8887-1-stefanha@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.42]); Fri, 10 May 2019 13:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 4/8] block: Add coroutine_fn to bdrv_check_co_entry X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , Kevin Wolf , Nikita Alekseev Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Nikita Alekseev bdrv_check_co_entry calls bdrv_co_check, which is a coroutine function. Thus, it also needs to be marked as a coroutine. Signed-off-by: Nikita Alekseev Message-id: 20190401093051.16488-1-n.alekseev2104@gmail.com Message-Id: <20190401093051.16488-1-n.alekseev2104@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- block.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block.c b/block.c index 7dc8fe289a..5c2c6aa761 100644 --- a/block.c +++ b/block.c @@ -4121,7 +4121,7 @@ typedef struct CheckCo { int ret; } CheckCo; =20 -static void bdrv_check_co_entry(void *opaque) +static void coroutine_fn bdrv_check_co_entry(void *opaque) { CheckCo *cco =3D opaque; cco->ret =3D bdrv_co_check(cco->bs, cco->res, cco->fix); --=20 2.21.0