From nobody Tue Feb 10 11:13:04 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1553284351106989.849646792701; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33953 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7QDM-0000IO-6q for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:52:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7Q3Q-0000VL-T3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:42:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7Pnb-00088p-0V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:25:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7PnY-00084e-Uk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:25:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2158308125E; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-112-49.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.49]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7675D75F; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:17:53 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9=20Lureau?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 20:17:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20190322191750.2997-2-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190322191750.2997-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> References: <20190322191750.2997-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/8] slirp: update COPYRIGHT to use full 3-Clause BSD License X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" According to commit 2f5f89963186d42a7ded253bc6cf5b32abb45cec ("Remove the advertising clause from the slirp license"), Danny Gasparovski gave permission to license slirp code under 3-clause BSD license: Subject: RE: Slirp license Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:51:00 +1100 From: "Gasparovski, Daniel" To: "Richard Fontana" I have no objection to having Slirp code in QEMU be licensed under the 3-clause BSD license. slirp/COPYRIGHT's initial version in 2004 (commit 5fafdf24) listed only 3 clauses BUT used the poisonous advertising clause for clause 3 which is the controversial clause of non-free 4-clause (that is, it appears that the BSD-4 license was copied, and then the WRONG clause was deleted, when creating COPYRIGHT. Perhaps explained as an easy mistake to make since 3-clause was created by removing clause 3 of the 4-clause, where you sometimes see the three-clause version with clauses 1, 2, 4; but more commonly see a renumbered version with clauses 1, 2, 3 to close the gap. If you pay attention only to clause numbers instead of content, it can be easy to confuse which clause to delete to go from 4-clause to 3-clause). Commit 2f5f89963 removed the poisonous wrong clause on the grounds of moving from 4-clause to 3-clause; but did not add the missing clause, which makes it LOOK like the 2-clause version. But I think we have a decent enough trail showing the intent for 3-clause. Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth --- slirp/COPYRIGHT | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/slirp/COPYRIGHT b/slirp/COPYRIGHT index 1bc83d497e..9863ea31cb 100644 --- a/slirp/COPYRIGHT +++ b/slirp/COPYRIGHT @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ The copyright terms and conditions: 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. + 3. Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its + contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived + from this software without specific prior written permission. =20 THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY --=20 2.21.0.4.g36eb1cb9cf