From nobody Fri Oct 3 15:49:19 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1552077090693680.5206468758023; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 12:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2M9I-00029D-Vb for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 15:31:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2M7E-0000nO-W5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 15:29:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2M7B-0006pW-UI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 15:29:11 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2M79-0006jf-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 15:29:07 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91BDC04AC51; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 20:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from probe.bos.redhat.com (dhcp-17-160.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.160]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC2519751; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 20:29:04 +0000 (UTC) From: John Snow To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 15:28:44 -0500 Message-Id: <20190308202858.26636-4-jsnow@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190308202858.26636-1-jsnow@redhat.com> References: <20190308202858.26636-1-jsnow@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:29:04 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/17] block/dirty-bitmap: remove set/reset assertions against enabled bit X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, jsnow@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap are only used as an internal API by the mirror and migration areas of our code. These calls modify the bitmap, but do so at the behest of QEMU and not the guest. Presently, these bitmaps are always "enabled" anyway, but there's no reason they have to be. Modify these internal APIs to drop this assertion. Signed-off-by: John Snow Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Message-id: 20190223000614.13894-4-jsnow@redhat.com Signed-off-by: John Snow --- block/dirty-bitmap.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c index c8fa21b526..b2b32e0323 100644 --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter) void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap_locked(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes) { - assert(bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(bitmap)); assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(bitmap)); hbitmap_set(bitmap->bitmap, offset, bytes); } @@ -561,7 +560,6 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, void bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap_locked(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes) { - assert(bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(bitmap)); assert(!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(bitmap)); hbitmap_reset(bitmap->bitmap, offset, bytes); } --=20 2.17.2