While at it, s/QMU/QEMU in @CpuDefinitionInfo.
Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
---
qapi/misc.json | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qapi/misc.json b/qapi/misc.json
index ada9af5add..f98de3a58c 100644
--- a/qapi/misc.json
+++ b/qapi/misc.json
@@ -2017,7 +2017,7 @@
#
# @migration-safe: whether a CPU definition can be safely used for
# migration in combination with a QEMU compatibility machine
-# when migrating between different QMU versions and between
+# when migrating between different QEMU versions and between
# hosts with different sets of (hardware or software)
# capabilities. If not provided, information is not available
# and callers should not assume the CPU definition to be
@@ -2126,11 +2126,11 @@
# @static: Expand to a static CPU model, a combination of a static base
# model name and property delta changes. As the static base model will
# never change, the expanded CPU model will be the same, independent of
-# independent of QEMU version, machine type, machine options, and
-# accelerator options. Therefore, the resulting model can be used by
-# tooling without having to specify a compatibility machine - e.g. when
-# displaying the "host" model. static CPU models are migration-safe.
-#
+# QEMU version, machine type, machine options, and accelerator options.
+# Therefore, the resulting model can be used by tooling without having
+# to specify a compatibility machine - e.g. when displaying the "host"
+# model. The @static CPU models are migration-safe.
+
# @full: Expand all properties. The produced model is not guaranteed to be
# migration-safe, but allows tooling to get an insight and work with
# model details.
--
2.17.1
Hi On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:02 PM Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote: > > While at it, s/QMU/QEMU in @CpuDefinitionInfo. > > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> > --- > qapi/misc.json | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/qapi/misc.json b/qapi/misc.json > index ada9af5add..f98de3a58c 100644 > --- a/qapi/misc.json > +++ b/qapi/misc.json > @@ -2017,7 +2017,7 @@ > # > # @migration-safe: whether a CPU definition can be safely used for > # migration in combination with a QEMU compatibility machine > -# when migrating between different QMU versions and between > +# when migrating between different QEMU versions and between > # hosts with different sets of (hardware or software) > # capabilities. If not provided, information is not available > # and callers should not assume the CPU definition to be > @@ -2126,11 +2126,11 @@ > # @static: Expand to a static CPU model, a combination of a static base > # model name and property delta changes. As the static base model will > # never change, the expanded CPU model will be the same, independent of > -# independent of QEMU version, machine type, machine options, and > -# accelerator options. Therefore, the resulting model can be used by > -# tooling without having to specify a compatibility machine - e.g. when > -# displaying the "host" model. static CPU models are migration-safe. > -# > +# QEMU version, machine type, machine options, and accelerator options. > +# Therefore, the resulting model can be used by tooling without having > +# to specify a compatibility machine - e.g. when displaying the "host" > +# model. The @static CPU models are migration-safe. > + > # @full: Expand all properties. The produced model is not guaranteed to be > # migration-safe, but allows tooling to get an insight and work with > # model details. > -- > 2.17.1 > > -- Marc-André Lureau
On 10/3/18 5:46 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > While at it, s/QMU/QEMU in @CpuDefinitionInfo. Could mention that it was a repetition of 'independent of'. > > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> > --- > qapi/misc.json | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > > diff --git a/qapi/misc.json b/qapi/misc.json > index ada9af5add..f98de3a58c 100644 > --- a/qapi/misc.json > +++ b/qapi/misc.json > @@ -2017,7 +2017,7 @@ > # > # @migration-safe: whether a CPU definition can be safely used for > # migration in combination with a QEMU compatibility machine > -# when migrating between different QMU versions and between > +# when migrating between different QEMU versions and between > # hosts with different sets of (hardware or software) > # capabilities. If not provided, information is not available > # and callers should not assume the CPU definition to be > @@ -2126,11 +2126,11 @@ > # @static: Expand to a static CPU model, a combination of a static base > # model name and property delta changes. As the static base model will > # never change, the expanded CPU model will be the same, independent of > -# independent of QEMU version, machine type, machine options, and > -# accelerator options. Therefore, the resulting model can be used by > -# tooling without having to specify a compatibility machine - e.g. when > -# displaying the "host" model. static CPU models are migration-safe. > -# > +# QEMU version, machine type, machine options, and accelerator options. > +# Therefore, the resulting model can be used by tooling without having > +# to specify a compatibility machine - e.g. when displaying the "host" > +# model. The @static CPU models are migration-safe. > + > # @full: Expand all properties. The produced model is not guaranteed to be > # migration-safe, but allows tooling to get an insight and work with > # model details. > -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:26:26AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/3/18 5:46 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > While at it, s/QMU/QEMU in @CpuDefinitionInfo. > > Could mention that it was a repetition of 'independent of'. Whoever is merging this, please touch up the commit message by adding: "Remove repetition of 'independent of'" Thanks! [...] -- /kashyap
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > While at it, s/QMU/QEMU in @CpuDefinitionInfo. > > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Will this go through the QAPI tree? -- Eduardo
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: >> While at it, s/QMU/QEMU in @CpuDefinitionInfo. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> > > Will this go through the QAPI tree? Queued with the commit message updated as requested by Kashyap. Thanks!
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.