From nobody Tue Feb 10 04:03:13 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1531204719132902.6775206913248; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46085 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcmII-0006Yr-4u for importer@patchew.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:38:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcmCh-00026C-5b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:32:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcmCg-0007zD-F4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:32:51 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:45570 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcmCe-0007yV-EM; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 02:32:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBA6400E9A3; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lemon.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-12-114.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38C916873; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:32:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Fam Zheng To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:31:23 +0800 Message-Id: <20180710063124.2263-10-famz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180710063124.2263-1-famz@redhat.com> References: <20180710063124.2263-1-famz@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:32:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:32:48 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'famz@redhat.com' RCPT:'' X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.187.233.73 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/10] block: Fix bdrv_co_truncate overlap check X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, Fam Zheng , qemu-block@nongnu.org, John Snow , Jeff Cody , Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" If we are growing the image and potentially using preallocation for the new area, we need to make sure that no write requests are made to the "preallocated" area which is [@old_size, @offset), not [@offset, offset * 2 - @old_size). Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng Reviewed-by: Eric Blake --- block/io.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index 9687da1ce9..e3e2d5286d 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -3113,7 +3113,8 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_truncate(BdrvChild *child, i= nt64_t offset, } =20 bdrv_inc_in_flight(bs); - tracked_request_begin(&req, bs, offset, new_bytes, BDRV_TRACKED_TRUNCA= TE); + tracked_request_begin(&req, bs, offset - new_bytes, new_bytes, + BDRV_TRACKED_TRUNCATE); =20 /* If we are growing the image and potentially using preallocation for= the * new area, we need to make sure that no write requests are made to it --=20 2.17.1