From nobody Tue Nov 4 14:51:50 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (208.118.235.17 [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1530145685711619.4248711461089; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYKn1-0003Tp-0j for importer@patchew.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:27:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYKU6-0004m5-0E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:08:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYKU4-0004Tl-Vp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:08:25 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:55556 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYKTx-0004Cx-Uu; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:08:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CF84078B9E; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.40.205.153]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A871C5B9; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:08:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Max Reitz To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 02:07:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20180628000745.4477-16-mreitz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180628000745.4477-1-mreitz@redhat.com> References: <20180628000745.4477-1-mreitz@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:08:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:08:17 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'mreitz@redhat.com' RCPT:'' X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.187.233.73 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 15/31] blkverify: Make bdrv_dirname() return NULL X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" blkverify's BDSs have a file BDS, but we do not want this to be preferred over the raw node. There is no way to decide between the two (and not really a reason to, either), so just return NULL in blkverify's implementation of bdrv_dirname(). Signed-off-by: Max Reitz Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia --- block/blkverify.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/blkverify.c b/block/blkverify.c index 4a18baaf20..92fdd07d48 100644 --- a/block/blkverify.c +++ b/block/blkverify.c @@ -313,6 +313,15 @@ static void blkverify_refresh_filename(BlockDriverStat= e *bs, QDict *options) } } =20 +static char *blkverify_dirname(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) +{ + /* In general, there are two BDSs with different dirnames below this o= ne; + * so there is no unique dirname we could return (unless both are equa= l by + * chance). Therefore, to be consistent, just always return NULL. */ + error_setg(errp, "Cannot generate a base directory for blkverify nodes= "); + return NULL; +} + static BlockDriver bdrv_blkverify =3D { .format_name =3D "blkverify", .protocol_name =3D "blkverify", @@ -324,6 +333,7 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_blkverify =3D { .bdrv_child_perm =3D bdrv_filter_default_perms, .bdrv_getlength =3D blkverify_getlength, .bdrv_refresh_filename =3D blkverify_refresh_filename, + .bdrv_dirname =3D blkverify_dirname, =20 .bdrv_co_preadv =3D blkverify_co_preadv, .bdrv_co_pwritev =3D blkverify_co_pwritev, --=20 2.17.1