From nobody Fri Oct 24 22:13:26 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1518789279055508.1573832169996; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50823 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emgTE-0001Sy-9W for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:54:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emft2-0001lD-6J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:17:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emft1-0006GQ-8n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:17:12 -0500 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:40520 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emft1-0006G1-48 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:17:11 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C457C8182D32 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dgilbert-t530.redhat.com (unknown [10.36.118.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8FC213AEE2; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:09 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:16:24 +0000 Message-Id: <20180216131625.9639-29-dgilbert@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180216131625.9639-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> References: <20180216131625.9639-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.8]); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:17:10 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.6' DOMAIN:'int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'dgilbert@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.187.233.73 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 28/29] libvhost-user: Claim support for postcopy X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Tell QEMU we understand the protocol features needed for postcopy. Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert Reviewed-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau --- contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c b/contrib/libvhost-user/= libvhost-user.c index 1f988ab787..8acee9628d 100644 --- a/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c +++ b/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c @@ -185,6 +185,35 @@ vmsg_close_fds(VhostUserMsg *vmsg) } } =20 +/* A test to see if we have userfault available */ +static bool +have_userfault(void) +{ +#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__NR_userfaultfd) &&\ + defined(UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_SHMEM) &&\ + defined(UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_HUGETLBFS) + /* Now test the kernel we're running on really has the features */ + int ufd =3D syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK); + struct uffdio_api api_struct; + if (ufd < 0) { + return false; + } + + api_struct.api =3D UFFD_API; + api_struct.features =3D UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_SHMEM | + UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_HUGETLBFS; + if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_API, &api_struct)) { + close(ufd); + return false; + } + close(ufd); + return true; + +#else + return false; +#endif +} + static bool vu_message_read(VuDev *dev, int conn_fd, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) { @@ -938,6 +967,10 @@ vu_get_protocol_features_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg= *vmsg) uint64_t features =3D 1ULL << VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_LOG_SHMFD | 1ULL << VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SLAVE_REQ; =20 + if (have_userfault()) { + features |=3D 1ULL << VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_PAGEFAULT; + } + if (dev->iface->get_protocol_features) { features |=3D dev->iface->get_protocol_features(dev); } --=20 2.14.3