From nobody Tue Feb 10 05:17:21 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (208.118.235.17 [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1511874317661638.1158814147497; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37798 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJfZU-0001oj-Vk for importer@patchew.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:05:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49531) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJfXt-00015O-SF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:03:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJfXr-0003ez-SC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:03:29 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJfXi-0003cU-7Y; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:03:18 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C0C8C070145; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.redhat.com (ovpn-122-79.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.122.79]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACEC60484; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:03:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Eric Blake To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:02:47 -0600 Message-Id: <20171128130248.901-2-eblake@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171128130248.901-1-eblake@redhat.com> References: <20171128130248.901-1-eblake@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:03:17 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/2] nbd/server: CVE-2017-15119 Reject options larger than 32M X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, "open list:Network Block Dev..." , secalert@redhat.com, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, ppandit@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The NBD spec gives us permission to abruptly disconnect on clients that send outrageously large option requests, rather than having to spend the time reading to the end of the option. No real option request requires that much data anyways; and meanwhile, we already have the practice of abruptly dropping the connection on any client that sends NBD_CMD_WRITE with a payload larger than 32M. For comparison, nbdkit drops the connection on any request with more than 4096 bytes; however, that limit is probably too low (as the NBD spec states an export name can theoretically be up to 4096 bytes, which means a valid NBD_OPT_INFO could be even longer) - even if qemu doesn't permit exports longer than 256 bytes. It could be argued that a malicious client trying to get us to read nearly 4G of data on a bad request is a form of denial of service. In particular, if the server requires TLS, but a client that does not know the TLS credentials sends any option (other than NBD_OPT_STARTTLS or NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME) with a stated payload of nearly 4G, then the server was keeping the connection alive trying to read all the payload, tying up resources that it would rather be spending on a client that can get past the TLS handshake. Hence, this warranted a CVE. Present since at least 2.5 when handling known options, and made worse in 2.6 when fixing support for NBD_FLAG_C_FIXED_NEWSTYLE to handle unknown options. CC: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Eric Blake --- nbd/server.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/nbd/server.c b/nbd/server.c index 7d6801b427..a81801e3bc 100644 --- a/nbd/server.c +++ b/nbd/server.c @@ -673,6 +673,12 @@ static int nbd_negotiate_options(NBDClient *client, ui= nt16_t myflags, } length =3D be32_to_cpu(length); + if (length > NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE) { + error_setg(errp, "len (%" PRIu32" ) is larger than max len (%u= )", + length, NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE); + return -EINVAL; + } + trace_nbd_negotiate_options_check_option(option, nbd_opt_lookup(option)); if (client->tlscreds && --=20 2.14.3