From nobody Tue Feb 10 14:49:29 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: temperror (zoho.com: Error in retrieving data from DNS) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=temperror (zoho.com: Error in retrieving data from DNS) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1507589919006670.798561362149; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:58:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60131 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1h0I-0006X5-Ey for importer@patchew.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:58:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1gyT-0005LF-4i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:56:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1gyS-0004m1-Ep for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:56:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1gyS-0004lf-6b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:56:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE7D80F97; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 22:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.36.112.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ED162460; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 22:56:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 2FE7D80F97 Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com From: =?UTF-8?q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9=20Lureau?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:55:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20171009225623.29232-3-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171009225623.29232-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> References: <20171009225623.29232-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 22:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/42] tpm-tis: remove RAISE_STS_IRQ X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9=20Lureau?= , amarnath.valluri@intel.com, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_6 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This look like temporary hacking code. It shouldn't be necessary in release code, or there should be a runtime option for it. Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger --- hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 24 +----------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c index a9e9cbdeb2..c54dac32de 100644 --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c @@ -43,9 +43,6 @@ } \ } while (0); =20 -/* whether the STS interrupt is supported */ -#define RAISE_STS_IRQ - /* tis registers */ #define TPM_TIS_REG_ACCESS 0x00 #define TPM_TIS_REG_INT_ENABLE 0x08 @@ -98,21 +95,11 @@ #define TPM_TIS_INT_POLARITY_MASK (3 << 3) #define TPM_TIS_INT_POLARITY_LOW_LEVEL (1 << 3) =20 -#ifndef RAISE_STS_IRQ - -#define TPM_TIS_INTERRUPTS_SUPPORTED (TPM_TIS_INT_LOCALITY_CHANGED | \ - TPM_TIS_INT_DATA_AVAILABLE | \ - TPM_TIS_INT_COMMAND_READY) - -#else - #define TPM_TIS_INTERRUPTS_SUPPORTED (TPM_TIS_INT_LOCALITY_CHANGED | \ TPM_TIS_INT_DATA_AVAILABLE | \ TPM_TIS_INT_STS_VALID | \ TPM_TIS_INT_COMMAND_READY) =20 -#endif - #define TPM_TIS_CAP_INTERFACE_VERSION1_3 (2 << 28) #define TPM_TIS_CAP_INTERFACE_VERSION1_3_FOR_TPM2_0 (3 << 28) #define TPM_TIS_CAP_DATA_TRANSFER_64B (3 << 9) @@ -377,12 +364,8 @@ static void tpm_tis_receive_bh(void *opaque) tpm_tis_abort(s, locty); } =20 -#ifndef RAISE_STS_IRQ - tpm_tis_raise_irq(s, locty, TPM_TIS_INT_DATA_AVAILABLE); -#else tpm_tis_raise_irq(s, locty, TPM_TIS_INT_DATA_AVAILABLE | TPM_TIS_INT_STS_VALID); -#endif } =20 /* @@ -421,9 +404,7 @@ static uint32_t tpm_tis_data_read(TPMState *s, uint8_t = locty) if (tis->loc[locty].r_offset >=3D len) { /* got last byte */ tpm_tis_sts_set(&tis->loc[locty], TPM_TIS_STS_VALID); -#ifdef RAISE_STS_IRQ tpm_tis_raise_irq(s, locty, TPM_TIS_INT_STS_VALID); -#endif } DPRINTF("tpm_tis: tpm_tis_data_read byte 0x%02x [%d]\n", ret, tis->loc[locty].r_offset-1); @@ -912,9 +893,8 @@ static void tpm_tis_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr add= r, if (tis->loc[locty].w_offset > 5 && (tis->loc[locty].sts & TPM_TIS_STS_EXPECT)) { /* we have a packet length - see if we have all of it */ -#ifdef RAISE_STS_IRQ bool need_irq =3D !(tis->loc[locty].sts & TPM_TIS_STS_VALI= D); -#endif + len =3D tpm_tis_get_size_from_buffer(&tis->loc[locty].w_bu= ffer); if (len > tis->loc[locty].w_offset) { tpm_tis_sts_set(&tis->loc[locty], @@ -923,11 +903,9 @@ static void tpm_tis_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr ad= dr, /* packet complete */ tpm_tis_sts_set(&tis->loc[locty], TPM_TIS_STS_VALID); } -#ifdef RAISE_STS_IRQ if (need_irq) { tpm_tis_raise_irq(s, locty, TPM_TIS_INT_STS_VALID); } -#endif } } break; --=20 2.14.1.146.gd35faa819