From nobody Sun Feb 8 21:28:43 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@gnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@gnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1506631535945788.2644450969669; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxfgN-0001mD-O0 for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:45:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxfYv-0003q1-Kw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:37:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxfYu-00038c-AJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:37:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxfYu-00038H-44 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:37:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2535E4E4D4; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t460s.redhat.com (ovpn-116-18.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.18]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFC617F33; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 2535E4E4D4 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:36:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20170928203708.9376-10-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170928203708.9376-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20170928203708.9376-1-david@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:37:35 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/30] s390x/tcg: handle WAIT PSWs during interrupt injection X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, David Hildenbrand , cohuck@redhat.com, Richard Henderson , Alexander Graf , Christian Borntraeger Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@gnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" If we encounter a WAIT PSW, we have to halt immediately. Using cpu_loop_exit() at this point feels wrong. Simply leaving cs->exception_index set doesn't result in an immediate stop. This is also necessary to properly handle SIGP STOP interrupts later. The CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT will be processed immediately and properly set the CPU to halted (also resetting cs->exception_index to EXCP_HLT) Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c index f6747f3877..1a0d0770a9 100644 --- a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c @@ -467,6 +467,12 @@ void s390_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) do_mchk_interrupt(env); break; } + + /* WAIT PSW during interrupt injection */ + if (cs->exception_index =3D=3D EXCP_HLT) { + /* don't trigger a cpu_loop_exit(), use an interrupt instead */ + cpu_interrupt(CPU(cpu), CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT); + } cs->exception_index =3D -1; =20 /* we might still have pending interrupts, but not deliverable */ --=20 2.13.5