From nobody Mon Feb 9 12:15:11 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1505327291866147.96756687304662; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsCOR-0006EP-37 for importer@patchew.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:28:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsCHs-0000eH-IV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:21:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsCHr-000627-Ff for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:21:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsCHh-0005uu-K7; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:21:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7456C04B941; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-204-23.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E1A5EDE2; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:21:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com B7456C04B941 Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=mreitz@redhat.com From: Max Reitz To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:19:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20170913181910.29688-13-mreitz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170913181910.29688-1-mreitz@redhat.com> References: <20170913181910.29688-1-mreitz@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:21:12 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/18] block/dirty-bitmap: Add bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , John Snow Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This new function allows to look for a consecutively dirty area in a dirty bitmap. Signed-off-by: Max Reitz --- include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 2 ++ block/dirty-bitmap.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++ 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h index a79a58d2c3..7654748700 100644 --- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h +++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap_locked(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, void bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap_locked(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, int64_t cur_sector, int64_t nr_sectors= ); int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter); +bool bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter, uint64_t max_off= set, + uint64_t *offset, int *bytes); void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t sector_num); int64_t bdrv_get_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap); int64_t bdrv_get_meta_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap); diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c index aee57cf8c8..81b2f78016 100644 --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c @@ -550,6 +550,58 @@ int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter) return hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi, true); } =20 +/** + * Return the next consecutively dirty area in the dirty bitmap + * belonging to the given iterator @iter. + * + * @max_offset: Maximum value that may be returned for + * *offset + *bytes + * @offset: Will contain the start offset of the next dirty area + * @bytes: Will contain the length of the next dirty area + * + * Returns: True if a dirty area could be found before max_offset + * (which means that *offset and *bytes then contain valid + * values), false otherwise. + */ +bool bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter, uint64_t max_off= set, + uint64_t *offset, int *bytes) +{ + uint32_t granularity =3D bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(iter->bitmap); + uint64_t gran_max_offset; + int sector_gran =3D granularity >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS; + int64_t ret; + int size; + + if (DIV_ROUND_UP(max_offset, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) =3D=3D iter->bitmap->si= ze) { + /* If max_offset points to the image end, round it up by the + * bitmap granularity */ + gran_max_offset =3D ROUND_UP(max_offset, granularity); + } else { + gran_max_offset =3D max_offset; + } + + ret =3D hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi, false); + if (ret < 0 || (ret << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS) + granularity > gran_max_offs= et) { + return false; + } + + *offset =3D ret << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS; + size =3D 0; + + assert(granularity <=3D INT_MAX); + + do { + /* Advance iterator */ + ret =3D hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi, true); + size +=3D granularity; + } while ((ret << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS) + granularity <=3D gran_max_offset = && + hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi, false) =3D=3D ret + sector_gran= && + size <=3D INT_MAX - granularity); + + *bytes =3D MIN(size, max_offset - *offset); + return true; +} + /* Called within bdrv_dirty_bitmap_lock..unlock */ void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap_locked(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, int64_t cur_sector, int64_t nr_sectors) --=20 2.13.5