From nobody Tue Nov 4 13:04:20 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1504177763338211.49193606002234; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 04:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55049 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnNLd-0000sU-Ad for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:09:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnNI1-0006ea-BU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:05:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnNHv-0007bD-55 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:05:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnNHs-0007YF-Mu; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:05:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF9E7F3E4; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [10.42.22.189]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88DF9ABBC; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:05:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com BAF9E7F3E4 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com From: "Daniel P. Berrange" To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:05:15 +0100 Message-Id: <20170831110518.10741-2-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170831110518.10741-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20170831110518.10741-1-berrange@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:05:27 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] block: use 1 MB bounce buffers for crypto instead of 16KB X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Using 16KB bounce buffers creates a significant performance penalty for I/O to encrypted volumes on storage which high I/O latency (rotating rust & network drives), because it triggers lots of fairly small I/O operations. On tests with rotating rust, and cache=3Dnone|directsync, write speed increased from 2MiB/s to 32MiB/s, on a par with that achieved by the in-kernel luks driver. With other cache modes the in-kernel driver is still notably faster because it is able to report completion of the I/O request before any encryption is done, while the in-QEMU driver must encrypt the data before completion. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange --- block/crypto.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c index 58ef6f2f52..cc8afe0e0d 100644 --- a/block/crypto.c +++ b/block/crypto.c @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs) } =20 =20 -#define BLOCK_CRYPTO_MAX_SECTORS 32 +#define BLOCK_CRYPTO_MAX_SECTORS 2048 =20 static coroutine_fn int block_crypto_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, @@ -396,9 +396,8 @@ block_crypto_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sec= tor_num, =20 qemu_iovec_init(&hd_qiov, qiov->niov); =20 - /* Bounce buffer so we have a linear mem region for - * entire sector. XXX optimize so we avoid bounce - * buffer in case that qiov->niov =3D=3D 1 + /* Bounce buffer because we don't wish to expose cipher text + * in qiov which points to guest memory. */ cipher_data =3D qemu_try_blockalign(bs->file->bs, MIN(BLOCK_CRYPTO_MAX_SECTORS * 5= 12, @@ -464,9 +463,8 @@ block_crypto_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t se= ctor_num, =20 qemu_iovec_init(&hd_qiov, qiov->niov); =20 - /* Bounce buffer so we have a linear mem region for - * entire sector. XXX optimize so we avoid bounce - * buffer in case that qiov->niov =3D=3D 1 + /* Bounce buffer because we're not permitted to touch + * contents of qiov - it points to guest memory. */ cipher_data =3D qemu_try_blockalign(bs->file->bs, MIN(BLOCK_CRYPTO_MAX_SECTORS * 5= 12, --=20 2.13.5