From nobody Tue Feb 10 21:19:29 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1502445391561976.1637453910384; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 02:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg6gA-0000vk-B1 for importer@patchew.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:56:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg6dg-0007LT-Ne for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:53:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg6df-0002fl-O4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:53:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg6dZ-0002dW-9m; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:53:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 348182253A3; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lemon.redhat.com (ovpn-12-60.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.60]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944A117CCB; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:53:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 348182253A3 Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=famz@redhat.com From: Fam Zheng To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:53:28 +0800 Message-Id: <20170811095328.13298-3-famz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170811095328.13298-1-famz@redhat.com> References: <20170811095328.13298-1-famz@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:53:48 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10? v2 2/2] file-posix: Do runtime check for ofd lock API X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, jsnow@redhat.com, christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com, Max Reitz , Andrew Baumann Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" It is reported that on Windows Subsystem for Linux, ofd operations fail with -EINVAL. In other words, QEMU binary built with system headers that exports F_OFD_SETLK doesn't necessarily run in an environment that actually supports it: $ qemu-system-aarch64 ... -drive file=3Dtest.vhdx,if=3Dnone,id=3Dhd0 \ -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=3Dhd0 qemu-system-aarch64: -drive file=3Dtest.vhdx,if=3Dnone,id=3Dhd0: Failed to = unlock byte 100 qemu-system-aarch64: -drive file=3Dtest.vhdx,if=3Dnone,id=3Dhd0: Failed to = unlock byte 100 qemu-system-aarch64: -drive file=3Dtest.vhdx,if=3Dnone,id=3Dhd0: Failed to = lock byte 100 As a matter of fact this is not WSL specific. It can happen when running a QEMU compiled against a newer glibc on an older kernel, such as in a containerized environment. Let's do a runtime check to cope with that. Reported-by: Andrew Baumann Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng --- block/file-posix.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c index f4de022ae0..cb3bfce147 100644 --- a/block/file-posix.c +++ b/block/file-posix.c @@ -457,22 +457,19 @@ static int raw_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, QDic= t *options, switch (locking) { case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON: s->use_lock =3D true; -#ifndef F_OFD_SETLK - fprintf(stderr, - "File lock requested but OFD locking syscall is unavailabl= e, " - "falling back to POSIX file locks.\n" - "Due to the implementation, locks can be lost unexpectedly= .\n"); -#endif + if (!qemu_has_ofd_lock()) { + fprintf(stderr, + "File lock requested but OFD locking syscall is " + "unavailable, falling back to POSIX file locks.\n" + "Due to the implementation, locks can be lost " + "unexpectedly.\n"); + } break; case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF: s->use_lock =3D false; break; case ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO: -#ifdef F_OFD_SETLK - s->use_lock =3D true; -#else - s->use_lock =3D false; -#endif + s->use_lock =3D qemu_has_ofd_lock(); break; default: abort(); --=20 2.13.4