From nobody Fri Dec 19 17:42:07 2025 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 15018105493271002.5675423317072; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43482 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddRWl-0006v4-Sd for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 21:35:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddRNR-0008IR-0s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 21:26:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddRNQ-0003tf-7Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 21:26:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddRNP-0003sj-M3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 21:26:08 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF828883AB for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.redhat.com (ovpn-121-23.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.121.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15807627D7; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 01:26:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com AF828883AB Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com From: Eric Blake To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 20:25:37 -0500 Message-Id: <20170804012551.2714-9-eblake@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170804012551.2714-1-eblake@redhat.com> References: <20170804012551.2714-1-eblake@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 01:26:06 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/22] qtest: Avoid passing raw strings through hmp() X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: armbru@redhat.com, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The next patch will add __attribute__((__format__)) to hmp(), which in turn causes gcc to warn about non-literal format strings. Rather than risk an arbitrary string containing % being mis-handled, always pass variable strings along with a %s format. It also makes it easier to prove correctness locally, rather than auditing all the source strings. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster Message-Id: <20170720214008.28494-4-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- tests/test-hmp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/test-hmp.c b/tests/test-hmp.c index 729c0339f7..4aadd6a432 100644 --- a/tests/test-hmp.c +++ b/tests/test-hmp.c @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void test_commands(void) if (verbose) { fprintf(stderr, "\t%s\n", hmp_cmds[i]); } - response =3D hmp(hmp_cmds[i]); + response =3D hmp("%s", hmp_cmds[i]); g_free(response); } @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void test_info_commands(void) if (verbose) { fprintf(stderr, "\t%s\n", info); } - resp =3D hmp(info); + resp =3D hmp("%s", info); g_free(resp); /* And move forward to the next line */ info =3D strchr(endp + 1, '\n'); --=20 2.13.3