From nobody Mon Feb 9 23:38:52 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1493493400715875.9133468577794; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4XrD-0000k2-8d for importer@patchew.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 15:16:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4XpA-0007fM-8b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 15:14:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Xp9-0006uY-2b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 15:14:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4Xp2-0006sP-Cd; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 15:14:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5063EC05973A; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 19:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.redhat.com (ovpn-123-177.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.177]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5C677A04; Sat, 29 Apr 2017 19:14:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5063EC05973A Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 5063EC05973A From: Eric Blake To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:14:11 -0500 Message-Id: <20170429191419.30051-2-eblake@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170429191419.30051-1-eblake@redhat.com> References: <20170429191419.30051-1-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Sat, 29 Apr 2017 19:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 1/9] qemu-io: Improve alignment checks X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Several copy-and-pasted alignment checks exist in qemu-io, which could use some minor improvements: - Manual comparison against 0x1ff is not as clean as using our alignment macros (QEMU_IS_ALIGNED) from osdep.h. - The error messages aren't quite grammatically correct. Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 Suggested-by: Max Reitz Signed-off-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Max Reitz Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 --- v11: retitle [was "qemu-io: Don't open-code QEMU_IS_ALIGNED"], improve error messages v10: new patch --- qemu-io-cmds.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-io-cmds.c b/qemu-io-cmds.c index 21af9e6..6a0024b 100644 --- a/qemu-io-cmds.c +++ b/qemu-io-cmds.c @@ -740,13 +740,13 @@ static int read_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char *= *argv) } if (bflag) { - if (offset & 0x1ff) { - printf("offset %" PRId64 " is not sector aligned\n", + if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)) { + printf("%" PRId64 " is not a sector-aligned value for 'offset'= \n", offset); return 0; } - if (count & 0x1ff) { - printf("count %"PRId64" is not sector aligned\n", + if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(count, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)) { + printf("%"PRId64" is not a sector-aligned value for 'count'\n", count); return 0; } @@ -1050,14 +1050,14 @@ static int write_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, cha= r **argv) } if (bflag || cflag) { - if (offset & 0x1ff) { - printf("offset %" PRId64 " is not sector aligned\n", + if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)) { + printf("%" PRId64 " is not a sector-aligned value for 'offset'= \n", offset); return 0; } - if (count & 0x1ff) { - printf("count %"PRId64" is not sector aligned\n", + if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(count, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)) { + printf("%"PRId64" is not a sector-aligned value for 'count'\n", count); return 0; } @@ -1769,8 +1769,8 @@ static int alloc_f(BlockBackend *blk, int argc, char = **argv) if (offset < 0) { print_cvtnum_err(offset, argv[1]); return 0; - } else if (offset & 0x1ff) { - printf("offset %" PRId64 " is not sector aligned\n", + } else if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)) { + printf("%" PRId64 " is not a sector-aligned value for 'offset'\n", offset); return 0; } --=20 2.9.3