From nobody Sat Apr 11 23:04:14 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=eik.bme.hu Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1772924820557803.8337828451475; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 15:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vz0iu-0006ak-JD; Sat, 07 Mar 2026 18:06:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vz0ip-0006Zr-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2026 18:06:11 -0500 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([152.66.115.2]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vz0in-0002xO-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2026 18:06:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3455596DA5; Sun, 08 Mar 2026 00:06:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zero.eik.bme.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10028) with ESMTP id lJ8T4RlKrC2V; Sun, 8 Mar 2026 00:06:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id DBCAD596D9D; Sun, 08 Mar 2026 00:06:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at eik.bme.hu Message-ID: <1f0bcb38e59456aa910376df6a375d63c2f3f442.1772924151.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu> In-Reply-To: References: From: BALATON Zoltan Subject: [PATCH v10 7/9] memory: Add internal memory_region_register_ram function MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Xu , Akihiko Odaki , Paolo Bonzini , Mark Cave-Ayland , Gerd Hoffmann , Max Filippov , Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2026 00:06:05 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Received-SPF: pass client-ip=152.66.115.2; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-Spam_score_int: -1 X-Spam_score: -0.2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.819, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.903, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org X-ZM-MESSAGEID: 1772924827163158500 Factor out common operation from memory_region_init_{ram,rom} functions to register the region for migration. This avoids duplicating the long comment in several functions. Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki --- system/memory.c | 80 ++++++++++++++----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) diff --git a/system/memory.c b/system/memory.c index 13d4e3314b..9a12224555 100644 --- a/system/memory.c +++ b/system/memory.c @@ -3676,18 +3676,10 @@ void mtree_info(bool flatview, bool dispatch_tree, = bool owner, bool disabled) } } =20 -bool memory_region_init_ram(MemoryRegion *mr, - Object *owner, - const char *name, - uint64_t size, - Error **errp) +static void memory_region_register_ram(MemoryRegion *mr, Object *owner) { DeviceState *owner_dev; =20 - if (!memory_region_init_ram_flags_nomigrate(mr, owner, name, - size, 0, errp)) { - return false; - } /* This will assert if owner is neither NULL nor a DeviceState. * We only want the owner here for the purposes of defining a * unique name for migration. TODO: Ideally we should implement @@ -3696,68 +3688,50 @@ bool memory_region_init_ram(MemoryRegion *mr, */ owner_dev =3D DEVICE(owner); vmstate_register_ram(mr, owner_dev); +} =20 +bool memory_region_init_ram(MemoryRegion *mr, Object *owner, + const char *name, uint64_t size, + Error **errp) +{ + if (!memory_region_init_ram_flags_nomigrate(mr, owner, name, size, 0, + errp)) { + return false; + } + memory_region_register_ram(mr, owner); return true; } =20 -bool memory_region_init_ram_guest_memfd(MemoryRegion *mr, - Object *owner, - const char *name, - uint64_t size, +bool memory_region_init_ram_guest_memfd(MemoryRegion *mr, Object *owner, + const char *name, uint64_t size, Error **errp) { - DeviceState *owner_dev; - if (!memory_region_init_ram_flags_nomigrate(mr, owner, name, size, RAM_GUEST_MEMFD, errp)) { return false; } - /* This will assert if owner is neither NULL nor a DeviceState. - * We only want the owner here for the purposes of defining a - * unique name for migration. TODO: Ideally we should implement - * a naming scheme for Objects which are not DeviceStates, in - * which case we can relax this restriction. - */ - owner_dev =3D DEVICE(owner); - vmstate_register_ram(mr, owner_dev); - + memory_region_register_ram(mr, owner); return true; } =20 -bool memory_region_init_rom(MemoryRegion *mr, - Object *owner, - const char *name, - uint64_t size, +bool memory_region_init_rom(MemoryRegion *mr, Object *owner, + const char *name, uint64_t size, Error **errp) { - DeviceState *owner_dev; - - if (!memory_region_init_ram_flags_nomigrate(mr, owner, name, - size, 0, errp)) { + if (!memory_region_init_ram_flags_nomigrate(mr, owner, name, size, 0, + errp)) { return false; } mr->readonly =3D true; - /* This will assert if owner is neither NULL nor a DeviceState. - * We only want the owner here for the purposes of defining a - * unique name for migration. TODO: Ideally we should implement - * a naming scheme for Objects which are not DeviceStates, in - * which case we can relax this restriction. - */ - owner_dev =3D DEVICE(owner); - vmstate_register_ram(mr, owner_dev); - + memory_region_register_ram(mr, owner); return true; } =20 -bool memory_region_init_rom_device(MemoryRegion *mr, - Object *owner, - const MemoryRegionOps *ops, - void *opaque, - const char *name, - uint64_t size, +bool memory_region_init_rom_device(MemoryRegion *mr, Object *owner, + const MemoryRegionOps *ops, void *opaqu= e, + const char *name, uint64_t size, Error **errp) { - DeviceState *owner_dev; Error *err =3D NULL; =20 assert(ops); @@ -3771,15 +3745,7 @@ bool memory_region_init_rom_device(MemoryRegion *mr, error_propagate(errp, err); return false; } - /* This will assert if owner is neither NULL nor a DeviceState. - * We only want the owner here for the purposes of defining a - * unique name for migration. TODO: Ideally we should implement - * a naming scheme for Objects which are not DeviceStates, in - * which case we can relax this restriction. - */ - owner_dev =3D DEVICE(owner); - vmstate_register_ram(mr, owner_dev); - + memory_region_register_ram(mr, owner); return true; } =20 --=20 2.41.3