From nobody Mon Feb 9 08:00:35 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.51.188.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583230517; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=G803WcyaL4psdFpfJ4EAPdp28E6oqDeERg2FPxWPOBBnfThfCC+9M5YrSmVpN3UR37SIYtQv5wwvZYEVNIoctVXiMMai6V4qu7F80tkjqdk90GGDG7Lr5CARaxjZBN7sB9jZXnBRNIwRf5a03GFLWNMaV8T/ARs3PQu3/iIDw2M= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1583230517; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Id:List-Archive:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Sender:Subject:To; bh=XbaZZadeEkAqeV8qb2+C5LgL/ogdsMt/MVvvFGwr/Ao=; b=Y47Jhgr6fVTPB6eQxd4nx2ZQGql6S5ERrEBToIsDx1R7MkyPjN+lXKJCahY/+zcOkcfVSyRatFnxeub0O5+oJ9WTThirKtI3jvxt4GStroB1i099sDEQnoDBeNI8fQQeO2/cmrTNT7Ae/epBtsBT3nekYCUwk2ooLPefP4TPkD0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=fail; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail header.from= (p=none dis=none) header.from= Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1583230517813184.76016610208706; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 02:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j94a4-0008F0-H3 for importer@patchew.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 05:15:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j94W9-0007oB-DR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 05:11:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j94W8-0006Cy-6E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 05:11:13 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:55181 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j94W8-0006Cm-3E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 05:11:12 -0500 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-408-ZkTBH3oqNHuzqx8u8Wr0WA-1; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 05:11:09 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5816189F767; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jason-ThinkPad-T430s.redhat.com (ovpn-12-98.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.98]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4398D56B; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:11:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583230271; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XbaZZadeEkAqeV8qb2+C5LgL/ogdsMt/MVvvFGwr/Ao=; b=C8yn3x27AyqkEyx7/zXw1P6Bh3t2PnsOTxcU6Kh6xkMbGSsobzcovh7UbLGJDkessm6cf8 cCJ1zLJ/MBrG5uuzo+/vdUqhgrmgmtqFzfF68iQvd9kCypLdnh5rKaWyaD09pN7Y+WEbnj V3teAcmYBfwjbo1g1pume1hvRyGFFgk= X-MC-Unique: ZkTBH3oqNHuzqx8u8Wr0WA-1 From: Jason Wang To: peter.maydell@linaro.org Subject: [PULL V2 10/23] dp8393x: Pad frames to word or long word boundary Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:10:29 +0800 Message-Id: <1583230242-14597-11-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1583230242-14597-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> References: <1583230242-14597-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jason Wang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Finn Thain Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail-DKIM: fail (Header signature does not verify) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Finn Thain The existing code has a bug where the Remaining Buffer Word Count (RBWC) is calculated with a truncating division, which gives the wrong result for odd-sized packets. Section 1.4.1 of the datasheet says, Once the end of the packet has been reached, the serializer will fill out the last word (16-bit mode) or long word (32-bit mode) if the last byte did not end on a word or long word boundary respectively. The fill byte will be 0FFh. Implement buffer padding so that buffer limits are correctly enforced. Signed-off-by: Finn Thain Tested-by: Laurent Vivier Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 Signed-off-by: Jason Wang --- hw/net/dp8393x.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/net/dp8393x.c b/hw/net/dp8393x.c index d8bf248..22b4d36 100644 --- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c +++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c @@ -768,16 +768,23 @@ static ssize_t dp8393x_receive(NetClientState *nc, co= nst uint8_t * buf, dp8393xState *s =3D qemu_get_nic_opaque(nc); int packet_type; uint32_t available, address; - int width, rx_len =3D pkt_size; + int width, rx_len, padded_len; uint32_t checksum; int size; =20 - width =3D (s->regs[SONIC_DCR] & SONIC_DCR_DW) ? 2 : 1; - s->regs[SONIC_RCR] &=3D ~(SONIC_RCR_PRX | SONIC_RCR_LBK | SONIC_RCR_FA= ER | SONIC_RCR_CRCR | SONIC_RCR_LPKT | SONIC_RCR_BC | SONIC_RCR_MC); =20 - if (pkt_size + 4 > dp8393x_rbwc(s) * 2) { + rx_len =3D pkt_size + sizeof(checksum); + if (s->regs[SONIC_DCR] & SONIC_DCR_DW) { + width =3D 2; + padded_len =3D ((rx_len - 1) | 3) + 1; + } else { + width =3D 1; + padded_len =3D ((rx_len - 1) | 1) + 1; + } + + if (padded_len > dp8393x_rbwc(s) * 2) { DPRINTF("oversize packet, pkt_size is %d\n", pkt_size); s->regs[SONIC_ISR] |=3D SONIC_ISR_RBAE; dp8393x_update_irq(s); @@ -812,22 +819,32 @@ static ssize_t dp8393x_receive(NetClientState *nc, co= nst uint8_t * buf, s->regs[SONIC_TRBA0] =3D s->regs[SONIC_CRBA0]; =20 /* Calculate the ethernet checksum */ - checksum =3D cpu_to_le32(crc32(0, buf, rx_len)); + checksum =3D cpu_to_le32(crc32(0, buf, pkt_size)); =20 /* Put packet into RBA */ DPRINTF("Receive packet at %08x\n", dp8393x_crba(s)); address =3D dp8393x_crba(s); address_space_write(&s->as, address, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, - buf, rx_len); - address +=3D rx_len; + buf, pkt_size); + address +=3D pkt_size; + + /* Put frame checksum into RBA */ address_space_write(&s->as, address, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, - &checksum, 4); - address +=3D 4; - rx_len +=3D 4; + &checksum, sizeof(checksum)); + address +=3D sizeof(checksum); + + /* Pad short packets to keep pointers aligned */ + if (rx_len < padded_len) { + size =3D padded_len - rx_len; + address_space_rw(&s->as, address, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, + (uint8_t *)"\xFF\xFF\xFF", size, 1); + address +=3D size; + } + s->regs[SONIC_CRBA1] =3D address >> 16; s->regs[SONIC_CRBA0] =3D address & 0xffff; available =3D dp8393x_rbwc(s); - available -=3D rx_len / 2; + available -=3D padded_len >> 1; s->regs[SONIC_RBWC1] =3D available >> 16; s->regs[SONIC_RBWC0] =3D available & 0xffff; =20 --=20 2.5.0