From nobody Mon Apr 29 13:46:13 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail(p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1542892846902770.5960621758916; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 05:20:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46556 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPouT-0001Wt-F8 for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:20:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPotJ-0001BU-MK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:19:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPotG-0004ea-Hp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:19:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPotG-0004cj-Ac; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:19:30 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E370588314; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tuxracer.localdomain (ibm-p8-virt-03.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com [10.12.2.14]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7611E103BAB8; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:19:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Serhii Popovych To: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:19:27 -0500 Message-Id: <1542892767-37213-1-git-send-email-spopovyc@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:19:28 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 3.1 v3] spapr: Fix ibm, max-associativity-domains property number of nodes X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Laurent Vivier reported off by one with maximum number of NUMA nodes provided by qemu-kvm being less by one than required according to description of "ibm,max-associativity-domains" property in LoPAPR. It appears that I incorrectly treated LoPAPR description of this property assuming it provides last valid domain (NUMA node here) instead of maximum number of domains. ### Before hot-add (qemu) info numa 3 nodes node 0 cpus: 0 node 0 size: 0 MB node 0 plugged: 0 MB node 1 cpus: node 1 size: 1024 MB node 1 plugged: 0 MB node 2 cpus: node 2 size: 0 MB node 2 plugged: 0 MB $ numactl -H available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 node 0 size: 0 MB node 0 free: 0 MB node 1 cpus: node 1 size: 999 MB node 1 free: 658 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 40 1: 40 10 ### Hot-add (qemu) object_add memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmem0,size=3D1G (qemu) device_add pc-dimm,id=3Ddimm1,memdev=3Dmem0,node=3D2 (qemu) [ 87.704898] pseries-hotplug-mem: Attempting to hot-add 4 ... [ 87.705128] lpar: Attempting to resize HPT to shift 21 ... ### After hot-add (qemu) info numa 3 nodes node 0 cpus: 0 node 0 size: 0 MB node 0 plugged: 0 MB node 1 cpus: node 1 size: 1024 MB node 1 plugged: 0 MB node 2 cpus: node 2 size: 1024 MB node 2 plugged: 1024 MB $ numactl -H available: 2 nodes (0-1) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Still only two nodes (and memory hot-added to node 0 below) node 0 cpus: 0 node 0 size: 1024 MB node 0 free: 1021 MB node 1 cpus: node 1 size: 999 MB node 1 free: 658 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 40 1: 40 10 After fix applied numactl(8) reports 3 nodes available and memory plugged into node 2 as expected. From David Gibson: Reported-by: Laurent Vivier Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier ------------------ Qemu makes a distinction between "non NUMA" (nb_numa_nodes =3D=3D 0) and "NUMA with one node" (nb_numa_nodes =3D=3D 1). But from a PAPR guests's point of view these are equivalent. I don't want to present two different cases to the guest when we don't need to, so even though the guest can handle it, I'd prefer we put a '1' here for both the nb_numa_nodes =3D=3D 0 and nb_numa_nodes =3D=3D 1 case. This consolidates everything discussed previously on mailing list. Fixes: da9f80fbad21 ("spapr: Add ibm,max-associativity-domains property") Reported-by: Laurent Vivier Signed-off-by: Serhii Popovych --- hw/ppc/spapr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c index 7afd1a1..2ee7201 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static void spapr_dt_rtas(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, v= oid *fdt) cpu_to_be32(0), cpu_to_be32(0), cpu_to_be32(0), - cpu_to_be32(nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes - 1 : 0), + cpu_to_be32(nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1), }; =20 _FDT(rtas =3D fdt_add_subnode(fdt, 0, "rtas")); --=20 1.8.3.1