From nobody Mon Apr 29 10:13:41 2024 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zohomail.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 15053854317935.259930805286899; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 03:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsRWA-0005aM-Ke for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:37:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsRVL-0005Ar-Bb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:36:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsRVG-00053I-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:36:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsRVG-00051g-7N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 06:36:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E27F85542; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thh440s.redhat.com (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B535C54C; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:36:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3E27F85542 Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com From: Thomas Huth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck , Christian Borntraeger Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:36:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1505385363-27717-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:36:12 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Allow --enable-seccomp on s390x, too X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eduardo Otubo , Halil Pasic , David Hildenbrand , Farhan Ali , Pierre Morel , Christian Ehrhardt , Claudio Imbrenda , Jason J Herne , Dong Jia Shi Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch, so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger Acked-by: Eduardo Otubo --- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index fd7e3a5..83ba64e 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ if test "$seccomp" !=3D "no" ; then arm|aarch64) libseccomp_minver=3D"2.2.3" ;; - ppc|ppc64) + ppc|ppc64|s390x) libseccomp_minver=3D"2.3.0" ;; *) --=20 1.8.3.1