From nobody Sat Feb 7 07:38:51 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1488219771659584.1450458959406; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55581 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ciPwg-0000fH-CD for importer@patchew.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:22:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52199) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ciPfj-0002QR-HW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:05:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ciPfg-0001wV-NL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:05:19 -0500 Received: from orth.archaic.org.uk ([2001:8b0:1d0::2]:48677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ciPfg-0001lG-Dm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:05:16 -0500 Received: from pm215 by orth.archaic.org.uk with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciPfT-0002KN-DF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:05:03 +0000 From: Peter Maydell To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:04:35 +0000 Message-Id: <1488218699-31035-7-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1488218699-31035-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <1488218699-31035-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:8b0:1d0::2 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 06/30] sd: sdhci: Remove block count enable check in single block transfers X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Prasad J Pandit In SDHCI protocol, the 'Block count enable' bit of the Transfer Mode register is relevant only in multi block transfers. We need not check it in single block transfers. Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit Message-id: 20170214185225.7994-5-ppandit@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell --- hw/sd/sdhci.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/sd/sdhci.c b/hw/sd/sdhci.c index c270e09..6d6a791 100644 --- a/hw/sd/sdhci.c +++ b/hw/sd/sdhci.c @@ -570,7 +570,6 @@ static void sdhci_sdma_transfer_multi_blocks(SDHCIState= *s) } =20 /* single block SDMA transfer */ - static void sdhci_sdma_transfer_single_block(SDHCIState *s) { int n; @@ -589,10 +588,7 @@ static void sdhci_sdma_transfer_single_block(SDHCIStat= e *s) sdbus_write_data(&s->sdbus, s->fifo_buffer[n]); } } - - if (s->trnmod & SDHC_TRNS_BLK_CNT_EN) { - s->blkcnt--; - } + s->blkcnt--; =20 sdhci_end_transfer(s); } --=20 2.7.4