From nobody Mon Feb 9 07:56:33 2026 Delivered-To: importer@patchew.org Received-SPF: pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.118.235.17; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; Authentication-Results: mx.zoho.com; spf=pass (zoho.com: domain of gnu.org designates 208.118.235.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org; Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1487887499121336.32710572812596; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:04:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33127 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch1VN-0002jm-AD for importer@patchew.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:04:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch1CY-0007li-Dh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:45:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch1CW-0004dY-65 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:45:26 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch1CV-0004cV-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:45:23 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 022783D945 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-55.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.55]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1NLjMN1003317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:45:23 -0500 Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E54BE113860D; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:45:17 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:45:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1487886317-27400-16-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1487886317-27400-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> References: <1487886317-27400-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:45:24 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/21] qom: Make object_property_set_qobject()'s input visitor strict X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+importer=patchew.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-ZohoMail: RSF_0 Z_629925259 SPT_0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Commit 240f64b made all qobject input visitors created outside tests strict, except for the one in object_property_set_qobject(). That one was left behind only because Eric couldn't spare the time to figure out whether making it strict would break anything, with a TODO comment. Time to resolve it. Strict makes a difference only for otherwise successful visits of QAPI structs or unions. Let's examine what the callers of object_property_set_qobject() visit: * object_property_set_str(), object_property_set_bool(), object_property_set_int() visit a QString, QBool, QInt, respectively. Strictness can't matter. * qmp_qom_set visits its @value argument. Comes straight from QMP and can be anything ('any' in the QAPI schema). Strictness matters when the property's set() method visits a struct or union QAPI type. No such methods exist, thus switching to strict can't break anything. If we acquire such methods in the future, we'll *want* the visitor to be strict, so that unexpected members get rejected as they should be. Switch to strict. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster Reviewed-by: Eric Blake --- qom/qom-qobject.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/qom/qom-qobject.c b/qom/qom-qobject.c index 447e4a0..bbdedda 100644 --- a/qom/qom-qobject.c +++ b/qom/qom-qobject.c @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ void object_property_set_qobject(Object *obj, QObject *va= lue, const char *name, Error **errp) { Visitor *v; - /* TODO: Should we reject, rather than ignore, excess input? */ - v =3D qobject_input_visitor_new(value, false); + + v =3D qobject_input_visitor_new(value, true); object_property_set(obj, v, name, errp); visit_free(v); } --=20 2.7.4