From nobody Thu May 16 12:10:41 2024 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2392918636 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Kv45dW4Z" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705343512; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ymn48hAASsfFXqDPdV6S79Mz6bIxq+PovD72lSM1tEo=; b=Kv45dW4Zi0I2GdAeDoI61C7rOqeS4rTVVreGDGYfmpwth4rqXtFJyKtxCAtvw5HyLPKVYG ATEXpldjOkc7M8ddrixpSIkEtzMLlazYXUbytSFUju1H0DVhzedRx2Z0BTdNHOCpuCBntP NGZL2F2jcOGy3fQR5oHwkr/tb9KIOJQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-17-cydwYcwhO8CsAgAV9Tse2w-1; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:31:50 -0500 X-MC-Unique: cydwYcwhO8CsAgAV9Tse2w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88069881C80 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerbillo.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.225.49]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D812166B31 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:31:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Abeni To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH v2 mptcp-net] mptcp: relax check on MPC passive fallback Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:31:43 +0100 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; x-default="true" While testing the blamed commit below, I was able to miss (!) packetdrill failures in the fastopen test-cases. On passive fastopen the child socket is created by incoming TCP MPC syn, allow for both MPC_SYN and MPC_ACK header. Fixes: 724b00c12957 ("mptcp: refine opt_mp_capable determination") Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts --- v1 -> v2: - keep it simple don't bother handling DSS OoO pkts (matttbe) --- net/mptcp/subflow.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 1117d1e84274..0dcb721c89d1 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -783,7 +783,8 @@ static struct sock *subflow_syn_recv_sock(const struct = sock *sk, * options. */ mptcp_get_options(skb, &mp_opt); - if (!(mp_opt.suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_MPC_ACK)) + if (!(mp_opt.suboptions & + (OPTION_MPTCP_MPC_SYN | OPTION_MPTCP_MPC_ACK))) fallback =3D true; =20 } else if (subflow_req->mp_join) { --=20 2.43.0