The code using 'ssk' parameter of mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next() has been
dropped in commit "95d686517884 (mptcp: fix subflow accounting on close)".
So drop this useless parameter ssk.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 2 +-
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 +-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index d8da5374d9e1..4ae19113b8eb 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_subflow_established(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock);
}
-void mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk,
+void mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow)
{
struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm;
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 1a0b463f8c97..15cdcc0f03bd 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2467,7 +2467,7 @@ void mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
/* subflow aborted before reaching the fully_established status
* attempt the creation of the next subflow
*/
- mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(mptcp_sk(sk), ssk, subflow);
+ mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(mptcp_sk(sk), subflow);
__mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow, MPTCP_CF_PUSH);
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 3c938e3560e4..f67cb5596e41 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ bool mptcp_pm_allow_new_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
void mptcp_pm_connection_closed(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
void mptcp_pm_subflow_established(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
bool mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
-void mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk,
+void mptcp_pm_subflow_check_next(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow);
void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const struct sock *ssk,
const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr);
--
2.35.3