From nobody Mon Feb 9 14:29:49 2026 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5CDF1DA631 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737702710; cv=none; b=I7flDG3YGvLpFwXoGmHAcAom8uTRT6f1BILht3nVM6D6wJMX6vrOWlIGtFLkcHD1zqGccPoyKWSDtE9SKrCCZP4ULy6ymNSObcsvYRDGGJE/MuniunNb/hK0FY/gKERFn1c7oNDDVfwlQrdbEGO8pD/+SW+J+JaR4FbzRxWrb/8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737702710; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KuNv0+rd3Q6a++xI+nDM0W/N89DQMle6c7EhV18iqXI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=dqdPMZMKRWf88fxzdw6mXq+aTWsx2awEC7XFubJ9xf3+BtnMS6YgvT6vFtPlTQWt8jq3ChdkF43xOWMmFFpCNka49V5jilMyVdxzoPT/NXmxnOy6BqPSZojbuVhHlfara54wh4CAdOdPi+eJmed7YWASrW27LA7diMy2DTAnYng= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qK4VtTSE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qK4VtTSE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 769B9C4CED2; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:11:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1737702710; bh=KuNv0+rd3Q6a++xI+nDM0W/N89DQMle6c7EhV18iqXI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qK4VtTSE5QkEzi1Q588Y6lHJlqDuxmKm4+qmBbiya/PIqtcmHs1/a8Qo2FtOD3EYF ZHprKRbLWgRQn8uSaYm5l0qO+SzTl4gptUm6qD8szTnsgRxY6hRVDXLxd2vztYbMaO /7G3Cw5kBk9k0Iq7+mfZSn+PxxksK2c8nTN0qrUECPqln3PTWGmo2MDYNBrDx9TR/n QY3boQ/pzQdZgIp4QtpCy4pZsOiIfdLmoZDmLSFjdL0Rexc95OThxqBjGiDbnItGUR ETU3jnmEgmuAX13ozXBFgeAKzNcm7B92CP9Nf9jdM3llj+BkX9NMrxc6Gyi9LUXIPb i5Ao5+mWhXxNA== From: Geliang Tang To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Cc: Geliang Tang Subject: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 5/5] mptcp: use ipv6_addr_equal in addresses_equal Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:10:47 +0800 Message-ID: <6f6f731472cb7ac93f1e1689902673ebfee922ed.1737702298.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Geliang Tang Use ipv6_addr_equal() to check whether two IPv6 addresses are equal in mptcp_addresses_equal() is more appropriate than using ipv6_addr_cmp(). Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) --- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index 1462dc7e886d..6461aa742385 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ bool mptcp_addresses_equal(const struct mptcp_addr_info *= a, addr_equals =3D a->addr.s_addr =3D=3D b->addr.s_addr; #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6) else - addr_equals =3D !ipv6_addr_cmp(&a->addr6, &b->addr6); + addr_equals =3D ipv6_addr_equal(&a->addr6, &b->addr6); } else if (a->family =3D=3D AF_INET) { if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&b->addr6)) addr_equals =3D a->addr.s_addr =3D=3D b->addr6.s6_addr32[3]; --=20 2.43.0